[docs] [issue12960] threading.Condition is not a class
report at bugs.python.org
Wed Sep 14 15:16:52 CEST 2011
Nikolaus Rath <Nikolaus at rath.org> added the comment:
On 09/14/2011 04:29 AM, STINNER Victor wrote:
> STINNER Victor <victor.stinner at haypocalc.com> added the comment:
>> Yes, but further down it still says:
>> class threading.Condition([lock])
>> If the lock argument is given and not None, [....]
> What do you suggest? Replace it by class threading._Condition?
I don't have an optimal solution that would fit into the prescribed
layout. I think the best we can do is keep calling it class threading
Condition, but mention in the very first sentence that it isn't actually
threading.Condition is not actually a class but a factory function.
The returned instance, however, is guaranteed to have the behaviour
of a threading.Condition class as described here.
If the lock argument...
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
More information about the docs