[docs] [issue14461] In re's positive lookbehind assertion documentation match() cannot match
report at bugs.python.org
Sun Apr 29 06:40:16 CEST 2012
Ezio Melotti <ezio.melotti at gmail.com> added the comment:
Technically you are correct, however using zero-width classes inside a lookbehind doesn't make much sense, because the result would be equivalent even without lookbehind.
I replaced 'never' with 'not', because usually it will not match, except in these corner cases that can IMHO be ignored.
assignee: docs at python -> ezio.melotti
resolution: -> fixed
stage: -> committed/rejected
status: open -> closed
type: -> enhancement
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.3
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
More information about the docs