[docs] [issue11776] Constructor signatures missing in types module documentation
Nick Coghlan
report at bugs.python.org
Wed Aug 22 12:02:29 CEST 2012
Nick Coghlan added the comment:
Clarifying the request: the constructor signatures for internal types should be documented in http://docs.python.org/dev/library/types, rather than just listing the types.
If creation of new instances from Python is not supported, that should also be documented explicitly.
Some of the items are currently missing docstrings as well.
----------
nosy: +ncoghlan
title: types.MethodType() params and usage is not documented -> Constructor signatures missing in types module documentation
_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue11776>
_______________________________________
More information about the docs
mailing list