[docs] [issue15457] consistent treatment of generator terminology

[Chris Jerdonek]

Chris Jerdonek <chris.jerdonek at gmail.com> added the comment:

Thanks a lot for the excellent feedback.  I'll update the patch to incorporate it.

One background note: I tried not to be too strict about using "generator iterator" or "generator function" in place of "generator" in the general docs in deference to this remark in PEP 255:  "Note that when the intent is clear from context, the unqualified name "generator" may be used to refer either to a generator-function or a generator-iterator."

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue15457>
_______________________________________