[docs] [issue14674] Add link to RFC 4627 from json documentation
Ezio Melotti
report at bugs.python.org
Tue May 15 10:26:30 CEST 2012
Ezio Melotti <ezio.melotti at gmail.com> added the comment:
Thanks for the patch, I left more comments on the review page.
IMHO it would be better to list the differences in a bullet list and expand later, rather than having a section for the parser and one for the generator.
AFAIU the differences are:
* top-level scalar values are accepted/generated;
* inf and nan are accepted/generated;
* unicode strings (rather than utf-8) are produced/consumed;
* duplicate keys are accepted, and the only the last one is used;
You can then add examples and explain "workarounds", either inline or after the list (I don't think it's necessary to add the snippets you posted in the last message though).
> Sidenote: Is there any way to get notified of these reviews?
In theory you should get notifications, in practice it doesn't always work. We are still working on make it better.
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue14674>
_______________________________________
More information about the docs
mailing list