[docs] platform.python_implementation() miswording
corey at octayn.net
Sun May 27 22:00:21 CEST 2012
On Sun, 27 May 2012 21:44:48 +0200
Sandro Tosi <sandro.tosi at gmail.com> <sandro.tosi at gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm a non-native speaker, so can you please explain why your proposed
> version is better than the actual one?
The reason it is better is because there could be other
implementations not accounted for in the docs, and it would be silly to
have *every* possible implementation string. The first implies, to me,
that the list includes all possible values, which is simply false
> Also your phrase contains a typo: Python -> CPython.
Ah yes, my bad, it should read CPython.
More information about the docs