[docs] [issue16171] "do nothing" load_tests could be improved

[Michael Foord]

Michael Foord added the comment:

Yes the version of load_tests you show is better. However there is an outstanding issue to fix the load_tests protocol to work with pattern=None which is a better fix. (I think this is a bug in load_tests rather than a doc issue really.)

Issue 11218.

----------
resolution:  -> duplicate
stage:  -> committed/rejected
status: open -> closed
superseder:  -> pattern=None when following documentation for load_tests and unittest.main()

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue16171>
_______________________________________