[docs] [issue15457] consistent treatment of generator terminology

Chris Jerdonek report at bugs.python.org
Wed Sep 5 07:10:56 CEST 2012

Chris Jerdonek added the comment:

This slipped under my radar.  After starting work on this again, I realize that it would make sense to complete issue 15476 first.  The reason is that it would improve the process of referencing "code object" in the generator docs (Terry's suggestion) once "code object" is itself properly documented.

dependencies: +Add "code object" to glossary

Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>

More information about the docs mailing list