[docs] [issue15476] Add "code object" to glossary
Chris Jerdonek
report at bugs.python.org
Wed Sep 5 08:01:42 CEST 2012
Chris Jerdonek added the comment:
That's fine by me. I guess what's more important to me is that "code object" have a central, linkable definition *somewhere* (and not necessarily that this somewhere be a glossary entry). That way references to code object in the docs can link to a definition in the same way that we link to definitions of other words, functions, etc.
I was also planning on indexing the word more properly.
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue15476>
_______________________________________
More information about the docs
mailing list