[docs] [issue15476] Add "code object" to glossary

Chris Jerdonek report at bugs.python.org
Wed Sep 5 08:01:42 CEST 2012


Chris Jerdonek added the comment:

That's fine by me.  I guess what's more important to me is that "code object" have a central, linkable definition *somewhere* (and not necessarily that this somewhere be a glossary entry).  That way references to code object in the docs can link to a definition in the same way that we link to definitions of other words, functions, etc.

I was also planning on indexing the word more properly.

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue15476>
_______________________________________


More information about the docs mailing list