[docs] [issue17947] Code, test, and doc review for PEP-0435 Enum

Eli Bendersky report at bugs.python.org
Sat Jun 8 18:00:19 CEST 2013

Eli Bendersky added the comment:

Nick prudently moved the unique discussion to its own issue - 18042. Let's get the initial implementation & docs committed first (without unique in the implementation, although it's fine to have it as an example in the docs for now), close this issue, and then discuss in 18042 whether unique should be part of the stdlib-provided API or not.


Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>

More information about the docs mailing list