[docs] [issue15849] PEP 3121, 384 Refactoring applied to xx module

Stefan Krah report at bugs.python.org
Sat Jul 12 19:49:17 CEST 2014

Stefan Krah added the comment:

I think we should perhaps leave the xxmodule as an example for
static types and create another pep-384 version that mentions
*potential* performance traps.

Of course many modules won't suffer from this, but first-time
extension writers tend to paste from the examples and should
know the alternatives if they happen to write a performance
sensitive application.

nosy: +skrah

Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>

More information about the docs mailing list