[docs] [issue21782] hashable documentation error: shouldn't mention id
R. David Murray
report at bugs.python.org
Mon Jun 16 22:26:21 CEST 2014
R. David Murray added the comment:
Yes, I should have been clearer. By "poorly worded" I meant "id is involved, but the sentence does not correctly describe *how* id is involved". That is, the sentence is wrong as written.
The implementation is the same in both Python2 and Python3, though the source code organization and how it becomes the default hash is a bit different.
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue21782>
_______________________________________
More information about the docs
mailing list