[docs] Vocabulary: Using "integral" in library/stdtypes.html (issue 26512)

[vadmium+py at gmail.com]

https://bugs.python.org/review/26512/diff/16736/Doc/library/stdtypes.rst
File Doc/library/stdtypes.rst (right):

https://bugs.python.org/review/26512/diff/16736/Doc/library/stdtypes.rst#newcode364
Doc/library/stdtypes.rst:364:
+--------------------+------------------------------------+--------+
On 2016/03/14 08:44:32, storchaka wrote:
> Remained pluses are not needed. May be this is error.

Done.

https://bugs.python.org/review/26512/diff/16736/Doc/library/stdtypes.rst#newcode367
Doc/library/stdtypes.rst:367: | ``math.trunc(x)``  | *x* truncated to
:class:`numbers.Integral`  |
On 2016/03/14 08:44:32, storchaka wrote:
> I would write :class:`~numbers.Integral`.

Done.

https://bugs.python.org/review/26512/diff/16736/Doc/library/stdtypes.rst#newcode367
Doc/library/stdtypes.rst:367: | ``math.trunc(x)``  | *x* truncated to
:class:`numbers.Integral`  |
On 2016/03/14 08:47:40, Georg wrote:
>  :func:`math.trunc(x) <math.trunc>`

Done.

https://bugs.python.org/review/26512/diff/16736/Doc/library/stdtypes.rst#newcode369
Doc/library/stdtypes.rst:369: | ``round(x[, n])``  | *x* rounded to n
digits,                    |
On 2016/03/14 08:44:32, storchaka wrote:
> "n" should be emphasized as well as "x": *n*.

Done.

https://bugs.python.org/review/26512/diff/16736/Doc/library/stdtypes.rst#newcode373
Doc/library/stdtypes.rst:373: | ``math.floor(x)``  | the greatest
integral float <= *x*          |
On 2016/03/14 22:29:25, vadmium wrote:
> the greatest :class:`numbers.Integral` <= *x*

Done.

https://bugs.python.org/review/26512/