[docs] [issue26954] Add Guido's rejection notice to the "with" FAQ

[Steven D'Aprano]

New submission from Steven D'Aprano:

The FAQs include a discussion of the rejected Pascal "with" statement (different from the Python `with`). From time to time people propose variants of it, such as using a leading dot to make it unambiguous.

Guido has just firmly rejected the latest such proposal. The FAQ should be updated to make it clear that even with a leading dot the proposal is dead, with a link to Guido's pronouncement.

https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/2016-May/040070.html

----------
assignee: docs at python
components: Documentation
messages: 264832
nosy: docs at python, steven.daprano
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: Add Guido's rejection notice to the "with" FAQ
versions: Python 2.7, Python 3.2, Python 3.3, Python 3.4, Python 3.5, Python 3.6

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue26954>
_______________________________________