[Edu-sig] re: The trackball reality
ajs at optonline.net
Fri Oct 24 19:11:46 EDT 2003
>From the Nielson quote:
>Although you could imagine a society where language was easy to learn
because people communicated by pointing to words >and icons on large menus
they carried about, humans have instead chosen to invest many years in
mastering a rich and >complex language.
Which could be said to relate to my contrarian view about Python.
Its hard as shit to learn, really. Four years into it, and I consider myself
a rank novice.
I am not extraordinarily bright, but certainly not stupid.
Why would Python seem to want to avoid identifying itself as rich, and
*complex*. As central to its claims toward having educational value.
The best that it can be is no more complex than it needs to be to allow
empowerment at a level of depth that - to someone like myself - is truly
interesting. Python fools me into thinking this is largely so. But I am no
expert on the alternatives.
I wish it would seem to me less agains the grain to feel that the proper
approach is promoting the learning of Python as an difficult, arduous but
worthwhile effort. I think we set up people approaching it with other
expectations for likely defeat.
More information about the Edu-sig