[Edu-sig] Properties use case
ajsiegel at optonline.net
Wed Mar 15 15:41:20 CET 2006
kirby urner wrote:
>>I am sure I am taking at least a bit of a performance hit by going this
>>route. Does anyone see something simple I may be missing here to get to
>>where I am trying to get, without the hit?
>Sounds like the kind of question that should go with example code, but
>maybe that's just me.
What it seems to be is mostly a question of a limitation in my
understanding of what means type(xxx). I want to create a class that
impersonates a built-in type - in my case <type 'complex'>. And in fact
am working from pypy code that not only impersonates <type 'complex'>,
but within the pypy implementation, *is* <type 'complex'>. How does pypy
My motive is simply to con Numeric into a willingness to treat my
implementation of the complex number type - the mutable one - on the
same basis that it treats the built-in immutable one.
Is there a mechanism to con Numeric here?
>Edu-sig mailing list
>Edu-sig at python.org
More information about the Edu-sig