[Email-SIG] fixing the current email module

[Bill Janssen]

Stephen J. Turnbull <stephen at xemacs.org> wrote:

> I'm not sure what you're saying here.  RFC 822 is inclusive.  More or
> less, if it looks like a header, it is a header, and we need to parse
> it at least into field name and field body, whether RFC 822 defines
> more specific syntax for it or not.

That's right.  I was just pointing out that there might be any
collection of headers, even collections without "From" or "Date".

Bill