[Email-SIG] API thoughts
R. David Murray
rdmurray at bitdance.com
Wed Mar 2 01:52:51 CET 2011
On Tue, 01 Mar 2011 17:59:10 -0500, "R. David Murray" <rdmurray at bitdance.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 01 Mar 2011 13:58:50 -0800, Glenn Linderman <v+python at g.nevcal.com> wrote:
> > To support reading byte-stream HTTP headers, therefore, it is critical
> > that the email API accept an encoding from the application which "knows"
> > the encoding; presently cgi.py has to pre-decode incoming headers
> > because email does not have such a parameter. On the other hand, maybe
> > cgi.py shouldn't use email header parsing at all... since browsers don't
> > use RFC 2047 encoding in practice, the parsing of headers without such
> > is straightforward.
>
> I think it could make sense for the default input character set to be
> a policy parameter for the parser. Maybe not in the first version,
> though :)
Just to clarify: in the first version I check in. I'd expect to decide
about that part of the API not too far in to the development process,
and certainly well before 3.3.
--David
More information about the Email-SIG
mailing list