[EuroPython] Python conference software
jacob at strakt.com
Sat Jan 28 18:59:06 CET 2006
fredagen den 27 januari 2006 09.36 skrev Jean-Marc Orliaguet:
> FYI, you missed the point.
> My comments were not about the tools; it was about commitment from
> I have no suggestion whatsoever concerning the tools that are going to
> be used this year:
> Participants propose the solutions they like, and once a solution has
> been selected by a common agreement (as it was done on IRC during a
> meething in december las year), the contributors should get in
> "contribution mode", not in the "I-don't-like-the-software" mode or in
> the "I'm-going-to-evalute-the-workflow" mode.
> Organizing a conference is not about evaluating or selling software.
My comments were about my experiences from last year. They are of course
subjective, but I think it was important for the organisers of this years
conference to know what worked well, what problems I encountered and what
sort of things they are expected to produce. Having these things show up as
nasty surprises late in the process is not a good thing. For instance, we had
to manually make invoices for all people who wanted one at Europython 2004.
This turned out to be about 200 people and each invoice took about 5 minutes,
adding up to about 16 hours of staff time at the conference.
Benedikt and the other organisers have to make a decision on what software to
use. I think they should do so with as much information about the problem to
solve as well as the alternatives they have in order to be able to make the
From a personal standpoint, my offer to put more work into the CAPS system in
order to improve on what we had last year still stands, should the organisers
decide that they want to use this solution. If they go down a different
route, I will be happy to respond to questions, but I will not not put
efforts into building another system to suit Europython.
More information about the EuroPython