From gherman at darwin.in-berlin.de Tue Apr 1 23:12:54 2008 From: gherman at darwin.in-berlin.de (Dinu Gherman) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 23:12:54 +0200 Subject: [EuroPython] Talk lengths In-Reply-To: <47F0B6C0.1030700@egenix.com> References: <47F0B6C0.1030700@egenix.com> Message-ID: M.-A. Lemburg: > The comments on talk length are interesting... 30 minutes were > considered too short. I found 30 minutes a bit short as well > last time I did a talk in Vilnius. If you want to have discussions > and more time switching between talks, then 45 minutes are a lot > better, IMHO: 30 minutes talk, 10 minutes discussion, 5 minutes break > and switching. > > What do others think ? I assume, the average speaker likes to give longer talks and the average listener likes to consume shorter talks - a least for average talks. If you need prove that exceptional talks can be less than 20 min- utes have a look at ted.com, maybe starting here: http://www.ted.com/talks/view/id/92 (Hans Rosling) http://www.ted.com/talks/view/id/140 (Hans Rosling) http://www.ted.com/talks/view/id/229 (Jill Bolte Taylor) http://www.ted.com/talks/view/id/237 (Clifford Stoll) Thanks to Laura for pointing me to Hans Rosling's videos. David Boddie: > For simplicity, we decided that we should keep the 30 vs. 60 minute > slots and > make 45 minute sessions fill the rest of the time with discussion. > The idea > being that in-depth talks could run to around 45 minutes with 15 > minutes for > questions and demos - the longer the talk, the more time you have to > leave > for questions. That's the theory, at least. For EuroPython I think this is the best compromise and the easiest to schedule. Regards, Dinu From lac at openend.se Tue Apr 1 23:50:32 2008 From: lac at openend.se (Laura Creighton) Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2008 23:50:32 +0200 Subject: [EuroPython] Talk lengths In-Reply-To: Message from Dinu Gherman of "Tue, 01 Apr 2008 23:12:54 +0200." References: <47F0B6C0.1030700@egenix.com> Message-ID: <200804012150.m31LoWH2024025@theraft.openend.se> In a message of Tue, 01 Apr 2008 23:12:54 +0200, Dinu Gherman writes: >I assume, the average speaker likes to give longer talks and the >average listener likes to consume shorter talks - a least for >average talks. > >If you need prove that exceptional talks can be less than 20 min- >utes have a look at ted.com, maybe starting here: > > http://www.ted.com/talks/view/id/92 (Hans Rosling) > http://www.ted.com/talks/view/id/140 (Hans Rosling) > http://www.ted.com/talks/view/id/229 (Jill Bolte Taylor) > http://www.ted.com/talks/view/id/237 (Clifford Stoll) > >Thanks to Laura for pointing me to Hans Rosling's videos. Glad you liked them. It may, alas, take an exceptional person to make an exceptional talk at 20 minutes. see: "I have made this [letter] longer, because I have not had the time to make it shorter." Blaise Pascal, "Lettres Provinciales", letter 16, 1657 Laura From kirby.urner at gmail.com Wed Apr 2 02:13:48 2008 From: kirby.urner at gmail.com (kirby urner) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 17:13:48 -0700 Subject: [EuroPython] Videography Message-ID: Just wanted to say I really appreciate the effort that was put in to getting these Chicago Pycon talks archived to digital media in that high bandwidth file format we call MPEG, MOV, WMV or whatever we call it. A typical 30 minute talk yields a file of over 7 gigabytes on this hotel venue's equipment. I know this added dimension is a huge logistical undertaking, and having experienced Vilnius on the ground (loved it) would have to say POV has a lot on its plate already, so why not contract with a professional videography company (VOV?). Not saying that's in the budget, just saying it takes a lot of equipment and labor and isn't something for just volunteers, even if you get volunteers to help. Or maybe I'm wrong. If enough people bring their own video cameras and tripods, it could all happen spontaneously? Let's just say I'm skeptical. Here's another idea though: if video is impractical, go for good audio uptake, which you need anyway if you have big rooms and want decent projection, i.e. you'll need a mic anyway, so definitely grab the audio. Then let individual speakers take their voice tracks and go back to add video themselves, using whatever open (or closed) source magic. Given geek talks so often involve diagrams, source code, flow charts, comical interjections, it's not really a distance shot of the podium, some speaker pacing back and forth, that's most informative anyway. That being said, sometimes the physical delivery *is* a big part of it, so don't let my bias in favor of "cartoons" overly interfere (I call where I live "Toon- Town" and consider cartoons a primary medium). I'm very appreciative of the Pycon2008 channel on YouTube and the opportunity it affords me to (a) develop a larger audience for my own talk (session 53) and (b) catch up on talks that I missed, many of which had content of great interest to me, but I could only get to so many in such a viciously parallel environment (someday we should try a conference with only one track -- only keynotes -- everything else Open Space ala BarCamp (self-organizing -- or not). Anyway, I'm selfishly interested in Vilnius getting media coverage, simply because I'm an avid fan of EuroPythonistas and their multifarious (nefarious?) activities. Vicarious Vilnius is better than no Vilnius. Plus even if I'm there, I like seeing the experience shared with a wider audience. We talk a lot about wanting a more diverse group of attenders, gender- wise, agewise or whatever. Well, chances are a lot of wouldbes and/or wannabes will make up their minds based on what's on YouTube or whatever, just as they do re other "tourist destinations". For this reason, it's good to have all that Flickr fallout after every event. Those savvy enough to follow in this way are among those we'd like to recruit as new Pythoneers, why not. Just today I discovered the holdenweb lookback at the 2007 Pycon in Texas, which I missed, and found myself admiring what a difference videography might make, when it comes to attracting more people to open source in general, not just Python. http://youtube.com/watch?v=MbGQfQFbPjw Also, I've been chatting with Julie at O'Reilly about a subscriber service that'd help geeks with their home office screencasting (mathcasting a subtype). Why reinvent the same wheels over and over? Think clipart. Kirby From renesd at gmail.com Wed Apr 2 02:42:07 2008 From: renesd at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ren=E9_Dudfield?=) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 11:42:07 +1100 Subject: [EuroPython] review of hostel I stayed at last year - please review yours. Message-ID: <64ddb72c0804011742m39d9287djd9f16aefa13c1365@mail.gmail.com> Hello, I put a review of the hostel I stayed at last year in the wiki... http://www.europython.org/community/Accommodation_Suggestions It'd be nice if you could also review where you stayed too :) cheers, From renesd at gmail.com Wed Apr 2 02:42:07 2008 From: renesd at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ren=E9_Dudfield?=) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 11:42:07 +1100 Subject: [EuroPython] review of hostel I stayed at last year - please review yours. Message-ID: <64ddb72c0804011742m39d9287djd9f16aefa13c1365@mail.gmail.com> Hello, I put a review of the hostel I stayed at last year in the wiki... http://www.europython.org/community/Accommodation_Suggestions It'd be nice if you could also review where you stayed too :) cheers, From vscan at mail.amdsl.sk Wed Apr 9 05:08:41 2008 From: vscan at mail.amdsl.sk (SAGATOR mailer) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 05:08:41 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [EuroPython] Summary of undelivered emails: Tue Apr 8 14:31:26 2008 - Tue Apr 8 14:31:26 2008 Message-ID: <20080409030841.6E7213FB16@mail.amdsl.sk> This email is automaticcaly generated by SAGATOR. It contains summary of emails, which has been rejected or dropped. ---------------------[ beginning of report ]-------------------------------- 1. Sender: service at paypal.com [213.135.243.36] Recipients: europium at 2xing.com,europr at 36900.com,eurosales at accipiter.com,eurosales at actiontec.com,eurosales at adtron.com,eurorecruiting at amazon.com,eurori at amazon.com,eurorjs at aol.com,eurosales at artesia.com,eurosales at boats.com,euro-scm at cisco.com,europsych at egroups.com,europublicity at epitaph.com,euroresi at euroresidentes.com,europicos at hangame.com,eurosa at hao6.com,eurosales at hayes.com,europsych at human-nature.net,euroschools at moriartys.com,euroren at netscape.com,europython at python.org,eurosales at real.com,eurosales at yachtworld.com,europreacher at yahoo.com,eurosclaim2005 at yahoo.com Date: Tue Apr 8 14:31:26 2008 Status: SPAM DROPPED [SpamAssassinD()=3.15] Qname: /tmp/quarantine/200804/qm-20080408-143126-0 --------------------------------------[ end of report ]--------------------- From regebro at gmail.com Thu Apr 10 19:20:37 2008 From: regebro at gmail.com (Lennart Regebro) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 19:20:37 +0200 Subject: [EuroPython] Quick question: Message-ID: <319e029f0804101020q5f470243xba2b381314bdc93a@mail.gmail.com> How many came to Vilnius 2007? I can't find the numbers anywhere... -- Lennart Regebro: Zope and Plone consulting. http://www.colliberty.com/ +33 661 58 14 64 From marius at pov.lt Thu Apr 10 19:32:11 2008 From: marius at pov.lt (Marius Gedminas) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 20:32:11 +0300 Subject: [EuroPython] Quick question: In-Reply-To: <319e029f0804101020q5f470243xba2b381314bdc93a@mail.gmail.com> References: <319e029f0804101020q5f470243xba2b381314bdc93a@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20080410173211.GE19588@fridge.pov.lt> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 07:20:37PM +0200, Lennart Regebro wrote: > How many came to Vilnius 2007? I can't find the numbers anywhere... IIRC around 225. http://europython.org/community/Planning/Projections says 215. Marius Gedminas -- A real friend isn't someone you use once and then throw away. A real friend is someone you can use over and over again. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/europython/attachments/20080410/3bdbbc00/attachment.pgp From mal at egenix.com Sat Apr 12 00:59:47 2008 From: mal at egenix.com (M.-A. Lemburg) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 00:59:47 +0200 Subject: [EuroPython] Talk lengths In-Reply-To: References: <47F0B6C0.1030700@egenix.com> Message-ID: <47FFED63.6000707@egenix.com> On 2008-04-01 23:12, Dinu Gherman wrote: > M.-A. Lemburg: > >> The comments on talk length are interesting... 30 minutes were >> considered too short. I found 30 minutes a bit short as well >> last time I did a talk in Vilnius. If you want to have discussions >> and more time switching between talks, then 45 minutes are a lot >> better, IMHO: 30 minutes talk, 10 minutes discussion, 5 minutes break >> and switching. >> >> What do others think ? > > > I assume, the average speaker likes to give longer talks and the > average listener likes to consume shorter talks - a least for > average talks. > > If you need prove that exceptional talks can be less than 20 min- > utes have a look at ted.com, maybe starting here: > > http://www.ted.com/talks/view/id/92 (Hans Rosling) > http://www.ted.com/talks/view/id/140 (Hans Rosling) > http://www.ted.com/talks/view/id/229 (Jill Bolte Taylor) > http://www.ted.com/talks/view/id/237 (Clifford Stoll) > > Thanks to Laura for pointing me to Hans Rosling's videos. Thanks, I like those TED talks as well, but their scope is different. If you stick to the 30/60 schedule, please at least tell the speakers (and the track managers) to leave 5 minutes at the end for switching. -- Marc-Andre Lemburg eGenix.com Professional Python Services directly from the Source (#1, Apr 12 2008) >>> Python/Zope Consulting and Support ... http://www.egenix.com/ >>> mxODBC.Zope.Database.Adapter ... http://zope.egenix.com/ >>> mxODBC, mxDateTime, mxTextTools ... http://python.egenix.com/ ________________________________________________________________________ :::: Try mxODBC.Zope.DA for Windows,Linux,Solaris,MacOSX for free ! :::: eGenix.com Software, Skills and Services GmbH Pastor-Loeh-Str.48 D-40764 Langenfeld, Germany. CEO Dipl.-Math. Marc-Andre Lemburg Registered at Amtsgericht Duesseldorf: HRB 46611 From faassen at startifact.com Sat Apr 12 11:59:11 2008 From: faassen at startifact.com (Martijn Faassen) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 11:59:11 +0200 Subject: [EuroPython] blog entry on EuroPython and local PyCons Message-ID: Hi there, I just felt prompted to write a blog entry about the country-specific PyCons we've started to see and their relationship to EuroPython. Perhaps of interest to people here: http://faassen.n--tree.net/blog/view/weblog/2008/04/12/0 Regards, Martijn From regebro at gmail.com Tue Apr 15 09:02:34 2008 From: regebro at gmail.com (Lennart Regebro) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 09:02:34 +0200 Subject: [EuroPython] Hans Rosling: Preliminary yes. Message-ID: <319e029f0804150002w77399731r1dea1bf37e5499ca@mail.gmail.com> Hans Rosling has preliminary said yes to do the keynote, on Monday or Tuesday. He'll confirm next week. So. What now? :) -- Lennart Regebro: Zope and Plone consulting. http://www.colliberty.com/ +33 661 58 14 64 From funthyme at gmail.com Tue Apr 15 12:27:47 2008 From: funthyme at gmail.com (John Pinner) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 11:27:47 +0100 Subject: [EuroPython] Talk lengths In-Reply-To: <47FFED63.6000707@egenix.com> References: <47F0B6C0.1030700@egenix.com> <47FFED63.6000707@egenix.com> Message-ID: On 11/04/2008, M.-A. Lemburg wrote: > On 2008-04-01 23:12, Dinu Gherman wrote: > > M.-A. Lemburg: > > > >> The comments on talk length are interesting... 30 minutes were > >> considered too short. I found 30 minutes a bit short as well > >> last time I did a talk in Vilnius. If you want to have discussions > >> and more time switching between talks, then 45 minutes are a lot > >> better, IMHO: 30 minutes talk, 10 minutes discussion, 5 minutes break > >> and switching. > >> > >> What do others think ? > > > > > > I assume, the average speaker likes to give longer talks and the > > average listener likes to consume shorter talks - a least for > > average talks. > > > > If you need prove that exceptional talks can be less than 20 min- > > utes have a look at ted.com, maybe starting here: > > > > http://www.ted.com/talks/view/id/92 (Hans Rosling) > > http://www.ted.com/talks/view/id/140 (Hans Rosling) > > http://www.ted.com/talks/view/id/229 (Jill Bolte Taylor) > > http://www.ted.com/talks/view/id/237 (Clifford Stoll) > > > > Thanks to Laura for pointing me to Hans Rosling's videos. > > > Thanks, I like those TED talks as well, but their scope is different. > > If you stick to the 30/60 schedule, please at least tell the speakers > (and the track managers) to leave 5 minutes at the end for switching. Yes, we really must start enforcing this. And there should be no problem scheduling a mix of 30, 45 and 60 minutes talks. John -- From peter.bulychev at gmail.com Tue Apr 15 13:00:21 2008 From: peter.bulychev at gmail.com (Peter Bulychev) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 15:00:21 +0400 Subject: [EuroPython] Talk lengths In-Reply-To: References: <47F0B6C0.1030700@egenix.com> <47FFED63.6000707@egenix.com> Message-ID: I think that we should make the schedule more flexible. Of course, every speaker knows, how long is his presentation, but he doesn't know how many questions there will be. I've seen the following situation on several conferences: in the high point of the discussion the chairman said: "Ok, let's stop, it's time for another presentation" :) I think, that the power of the conferences like EuroPython is in their informality: if the topic is really interesting, it should be discussed. 2008/4/15 John Pinner : > On 11/04/2008, M.-A. Lemburg wrote: > > On 2008-04-01 23:12, Dinu Gherman wrote: > > > M.-A. Lemburg: > > > > > >> The comments on talk length are interesting... 30 minutes were > > >> considered too short. I found 30 minutes a bit short as well > > >> last time I did a talk in Vilnius. If you want to have discussions > > >> and more time switching between talks, then 45 minutes are a lot > > >> better, IMHO: 30 minutes talk, 10 minutes discussion, 5 minutes > break > > >> and switching. > > >> > > >> What do others think ? > > > > > > > > > I assume, the average speaker likes to give longer talks and the > > > average listener likes to consume shorter talks - a least for > > > average talks. > > > > > > If you need prove that exceptional talks can be less than 20 min- > > > utes have a look at ted.com, maybe starting here: > > > > > > http://www.ted.com/talks/view/id/92 (Hans Rosling) > > > http://www.ted.com/talks/view/id/140 (Hans Rosling) > > > http://www.ted.com/talks/view/id/229 (Jill Bolte Taylor) > > > http://www.ted.com/talks/view/id/237 (Clifford Stoll) > > > > > > Thanks to Laura for pointing me to Hans Rosling's videos. > > > > > > Thanks, I like those TED talks as well, but their scope is different. > > > > If you stick to the 30/60 schedule, please at least tell the speakers > > (and the track managers) to leave 5 minutes at the end for switching. > > Yes, we really must start enforcing this. > > And there should be no problem scheduling a mix of 30, 45 and 60 minutes > talks. > > John > -- > _______________________________________________ > EuroPython mailing list > EuroPython at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/europython > -- Best regards, Peter Bulychev. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/europython/attachments/20080415/2110f3e2/attachment.htm From cs at comlounge.net Tue Apr 15 13:20:50 2008 From: cs at comlounge.net (Christian Scholz) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 13:20:50 +0200 Subject: [EuroPython] Talk lengths In-Reply-To: References: <47F0B6C0.1030700@egenix.com> <47FFED63.6000707@egenix.com> Message-ID: <48048F92.6090604@comlounge.net> Hi! Peter Bulychev wrote: > I think that we should make the schedule more flexible. Of course, every > speaker knows, how long is his presentation, but he doesn't know how many > questions there will be. > > I've seen the following situation on several conferences: in the high point > of the discussion the chairman said: "Ok, let's stop, it's time for another > presentation" :) > > I think, that the power of the conferences like EuroPython is in their > informality: > if the topic is really interesting, it should be discussed. I wonder if this might be good for a barcamp like part, just schedule a discussion for that and discuss things further. I am also wondering if some conference makes sense where hald a day is normal presentations and half a day it's unconference like. Then there would be time in the afternoon to catch up on topics. Or simply provide 2 rooms or so additionally for barcamp style sessions during the conference. As for length I'd go with 30 or 60 mins so that people know that e.g. every full hour there will be a new talk. 45 mins makes it more complicated to remember when the next slot will start. As for Barcamp Ruhr we also made the experience that 30 mins has been too short usually for sessions (it was said afterwards though that people of course could have reserved two slots if they think they need longer). It was changed back to 60 mins then the next day. -- Christian > > 2008/4/15 John Pinner : > >> On 11/04/2008, M.-A. Lemburg wrote: >>> On 2008-04-01 23:12, Dinu Gherman wrote: >>> > M.-A. Lemburg: >>> > >>> >> The comments on talk length are interesting... 30 minutes were >>> >> considered too short. I found 30 minutes a bit short as well >>> >> last time I did a talk in Vilnius. If you want to have discussions >>> >> and more time switching between talks, then 45 minutes are a lot >>> >> better, IMHO: 30 minutes talk, 10 minutes discussion, 5 minutes >> break >>> >> and switching. >>> >> >>> >> What do others think ? >>> > >>> > >>> > I assume, the average speaker likes to give longer talks and the >>> > average listener likes to consume shorter talks - a least for >>> > average talks. >>> > >>> > If you need prove that exceptional talks can be less than 20 min- >>> > utes have a look at ted.com, maybe starting here: >>> > >>> > http://www.ted.com/talks/view/id/92 (Hans Rosling) >>> > http://www.ted.com/talks/view/id/140 (Hans Rosling) >>> > http://www.ted.com/talks/view/id/229 (Jill Bolte Taylor) >>> > http://www.ted.com/talks/view/id/237 (Clifford Stoll) >>> > >>> > Thanks to Laura for pointing me to Hans Rosling's videos. >>> >>> >>> Thanks, I like those TED talks as well, but their scope is different. >>> >>> If you stick to the 30/60 schedule, please at least tell the speakers >>> (and the track managers) to leave 5 minutes at the end for switching. >> Yes, we really must start enforcing this. >> >> And there should be no problem scheduling a mix of 30, 45 and 60 minutes >> talks. >> >> John >> -- >> _______________________________________________ >> EuroPython mailing list >> EuroPython at python.org >> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/europython >> > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > EuroPython mailing list > EuroPython at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/europython -- Christian Scholz video blog: http://comlounge.tv COM.lounge blog: http://mrtopf.de/blog Luetticher Strasse 10 Skype: HerrTopf 52064 Aachen Homepage: http://comlounge.net Tel: +49 241 400 730 0 E-Mail cs at comlounge.net Fax: +49 241 979 00 850 IRC: MrTopf, Tao_T connect with me: http://mrtopf.de/connect From funthyme at gmail.com Tue Apr 15 13:52:26 2008 From: funthyme at gmail.com (John Pinner) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 12:52:26 +0100 Subject: [EuroPython] Talk lengths In-Reply-To: References: <47F0B6C0.1030700@egenix.com> <47FFED63.6000707@egenix.com> Message-ID: On 15/04/2008, Peter Bulychev wrote: > I think that we should make the schedule more flexible. Unfortunately this does not work in a multi-track conference. It is very frustrating for delegates who want to go to talks in different tracks when they don't run precisely to schedule. If you want flexibility, you run an unconference or barcamp, or, in EuroPython, use Open Space. > Of course, every > speaker knows, how long is his presentation, but he doesn't know how many > questions there will be. > > I've seen the following situation on several conferences: in the high point > of the discussion the chairman said: "Ok, let's stop, it's time for another > presentation" :) > > I think, that the power of the conferences like EuroPython is in their > informality: > if the topic is really interesting, it should be discussed. That's why we have Open Space. John -- > 2008/4/15 John Pinner : > > > > > > > On 11/04/2008, M.-A. Lemburg wrote: > > > On 2008-04-01 23:12, Dinu Gherman wrote: > > > > M.-A. Lemburg: > > > > > > > >> The comments on talk length are interesting... 30 minutes were > > > >> considered too short. I found 30 minutes a bit short as well > > > >> last time I did a talk in Vilnius. If you want to have discussions > > > >> and more time switching between talks, then 45 minutes are a lot > > > >> better, IMHO: 30 minutes talk, 10 minutes discussion, 5 minutes > break > > > >> and switching. > > > >> > > > >> What do others think ? > > > > > > > > > > > > I assume, the average speaker likes to give longer talks and the > > > > average listener likes to consume shorter talks - a least for > > > > average talks. > > > > > > > > If you need prove that exceptional talks can be less than 20 min- > > > > utes have a look at ted.com, maybe starting here: > > > > > > > > http://www.ted.com/talks/view/id/92 (Hans > Rosling) > > > > http://www.ted.com/talks/view/id/140 (Hans > Rosling) > > > > http://www.ted.com/talks/view/id/229 (Jill Bolte > Taylor) > > > > http://www.ted.com/talks/view/id/237 (Clifford > Stoll) > > > > > > > > Thanks to Laura for pointing me to Hans Rosling's videos. > > > > > > > > > Thanks, I like those TED talks as well, but their scope is different. > > > > > > If you stick to the 30/60 schedule, please at least tell the speakers > > > (and the track managers) to leave 5 minutes at the end for switching. > > > > Yes, we really must start enforcing this. > > > > And there should be no problem scheduling a mix of 30, 45 and 60 minutes > talks. > > > > John > > -- > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > EuroPython mailing list > > EuroPython at python.org > > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/europython > > > > > > -- > Best regards, > Peter Bulychev. From fabio.pliger at gmail.com Sun Apr 20 22:54:44 2008 From: fabio.pliger at gmail.com (Fabio Pliger) Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 22:54:44 +0200 Subject: [EuroPython] Local Teams Message-ID: <631034d90804201354q2bf08464k19562e5c2436991e@mail.gmail.com> Hi All, I'm one member of the Pycon Italy organization team. It's been a while since I've been discussing about european integration of local national python organization and few days ago i've read this post ( http://faassen.n--tree.net/blog/view/weblog/2008/04/12/0 ).The great thing about this post is that it tryies to focus a big problem ( not only ): how to improve europython and how to manage with local conferences (bad?) influence. Thus, i've talked with Laura about it and exposed her my opinion: Why can't local teams and europython work together? Why not having local teams of motivated people that work for their conference and also for europython? They should have the right ambitious purpose, some experience organizing social event and.. they (should ;) ) love python! So.. my idea is to have Europython national team ( or representatives or whatever you want to call them ) that work inside their community ( and their conference )help to let people know about EP, about how it works, about how to get there ( maybe with other national pythonistas ), about anything you want... I, by myself, propose myself to run this ( with any other Python Italy that believes it's a good idea ;) ) for Italy and also to propose myself as regional-groups-coordinator, as Laura suggested. I hope this will be a good initiative for both Europython and local teams. If someone have any opinion or want to offer their help as local helpers feel free to give a shout! ;) Fabio Pliger -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/europython/attachments/20080420/6d325700/attachment.htm From bayokrapht at googlemail.com Thu Apr 24 03:47:49 2008 From: bayokrapht at googlemail.com (bayo) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 02:47:49 +0100 Subject: [EuroPython] attend europython2008 conference Message-ID: I would very much love to attend the europython2008. However lithuania does not seem to have an embassy in my country (Nigeria). I have read the docs on getting a visa and will proceed accordingly. Sounds like loads of fun. (just joined the mailling list, which explains this gratuitous posting :)) -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ From lac at openend.se Sat Apr 26 04:56:21 2008 From: lac at openend.se (Laura Creighton) Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 04:56:21 +0200 Subject: [EuroPython] attend europython2008 conference In-Reply-To: Message from bayo of "Thu, 24 Apr 2008 02:47:49 BST." References: Message-ID: <200804260256.m3Q2uL1b024934@theraft.openend.se> In a message of Thu, 24 Apr 2008 02:47:49 BST, bayo writes: >I would very much love to attend the europython2008. >However lithuania does not seem to have an embassy in my country (Nigeria >). >I have read the docs on getting a visa and will proceed accordingly. >Sounds like loads of fun. >(just joined the mailling list, which explains this gratuitous posting :) >) Welcome to the list. What are you currently using Python for? Laura Creighton From info at thegrantinstitute.com Tue Apr 29 10:11:11 2008 From: info at thegrantinstitute.com (Anthony Jones) Date: 29 Apr 2008 01:11:11 -0700 Subject: [EuroPython] Professional Grant Proposal Writing Workshop (May 2008: University of Ottawa, Ontario) Message-ID: <20080429011111.26F85EC34399C954@thegrantinstitute.com> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: