[EuroPython] Talk lengths
John Pinner
funthyme at gmail.com
Tue Apr 15 12:27:47 CEST 2008
On 11/04/2008, M.-A. Lemburg <mal at egenix.com> wrote:
> On 2008-04-01 23:12, Dinu Gherman wrote:
> > M.-A. Lemburg:
> >
> >> The comments on talk length are interesting... 30 minutes were
> >> considered too short. I found 30 minutes a bit short as well
> >> last time I did a talk in Vilnius. If you want to have discussions
> >> and more time switching between talks, then 45 minutes are a lot
> >> better, IMHO: 30 minutes talk, 10 minutes discussion, 5 minutes break
> >> and switching.
> >>
> >> What do others think ?
> >
> >
> > I assume, the average speaker likes to give longer talks and the
> > average listener likes to consume shorter talks - a least for
> > average talks.
> >
> > If you need prove that exceptional talks can be less than 20 min-
> > utes have a look at ted.com, maybe starting here:
> >
> > http://www.ted.com/talks/view/id/92 (Hans Rosling)
> > http://www.ted.com/talks/view/id/140 (Hans Rosling)
> > http://www.ted.com/talks/view/id/229 (Jill Bolte Taylor)
> > http://www.ted.com/talks/view/id/237 (Clifford Stoll)
> >
> > Thanks to Laura for pointing me to Hans Rosling's videos.
>
>
> Thanks, I like those TED talks as well, but their scope is different.
>
> If you stick to the 30/60 schedule, please at least tell the speakers
> (and the track managers) to leave 5 minutes at the end for switching.
Yes, we really must start enforcing this.
And there should be no problem scheduling a mix of 30, 45 and 60 minutes talks.
John
--
More information about the EuroPython
mailing list