From chris at chrisarndt.de  Mon Mar 10 19:04:53 2014
From: chris at chrisarndt.de (Christopher Arndt)
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 19:04:53 +0100
Subject: [EuroPython] europython.eu SSL cert expired
Message-ID: <531DFEC5.2000305@chrisarndt.de>

The SSL certificate of europython.eu (not ep2014.europython.eu) expired
this morning.

"europython.eu verwendet ein ung?ltiges Sicherheitszertifikat.

Das Zertifikat ist am 10.03.2014 06:57 abgelaufen. Die aktuelle Zeit ist
10.03.2014 19:03.

(Fehlercode: sec_error_expired_certificate)"


Chris

From mal at python.org  Mon Mar 10 19:33:59 2014
From: mal at python.org (M.-A. Lemburg)
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 19:33:59 +0100
Subject: [EuroPython] europython.eu SSL cert expired
In-Reply-To: <531DFEC5.2000305@chrisarndt.de>
References: <531DFEC5.2000305@chrisarndt.de>
Message-ID: <531E0597.7070803@python.org>

Hi Chris,

thank you for the notice. We'll get this fixed ASAP.

Cheers,
-- 
Marc-Andre Lemburg
Director
Python Software Foundation
http://www.python.org/psf/

On 10.03.2014 19:04, Christopher Arndt wrote:
> The SSL certificate of europython.eu (not ep2014.europython.eu) expired
> this morning.
> 
> "europython.eu verwendet ein ung?ltiges Sicherheitszertifikat.
> 
> Das Zertifikat ist am 10.03.2014 06:57 abgelaufen. Die aktuelle Zeit ist
> 10.03.2014 19:03.
> 
> (Fehlercode: sec_error_expired_certificate)"
> 
> 
> Chris
> _______________________________________________
> EuroPython 2014  Berlin, 21th27th July
> EuroPython mailing list
> EuroPython at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/europython
> 


From chris at chrisarndt.de  Mon Mar 10 23:54:45 2014
From: chris at chrisarndt.de (Christopher Arndt)
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 23:54:45 +0100
Subject: [EuroPython] Proposal review interface
Message-ID: <531E42B5.1090006@chrisarndt.de>

I just got approved as a proposal reviewer and had a look at the list of
proposals awaiting review. I noticed two things:

- I can't see the contents of the "Notes" field in the submission form
for proposals listed anywhere. Since this was advertised especially as
an opportunity to pass explanatory remarks to the reviewers, this
omission is very unfortunate.

- I'm fairly certain that in the form to submit training proposals the
first two text areas were labelled "Structure" and "Description" instead
of "Abstract" and "Description" and they were in reverse order.

The result is that training proposals now contain a narrative of the
structure in the abstract field, where reviewers would probably would
expect a short description of (the topics of) the training, seeing that
the section is labelled "Abstract" and is listed first.


Can we please make the contents of the "Notes" field visible to the
reviewers?

Can we label the sections in the reviewer view the same as they were
labelled in the submission form?

Can we make sure that for trainings the right text ends up in the
conference program (i.e. the contents of the "Description" field)?


Chris

From ep at zopyx.com  Tue Mar 11 06:10:57 2014
From: ep at zopyx.com (Andreas Jung)
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 06:10:57 +0100
Subject: [EuroPython] Proposal review interface
In-Reply-To: <531E42B5.1090006@chrisarndt.de>
References: <531E42B5.1090006@chrisarndt.de>
Message-ID: <F7E46B64-3996-4A80-A1EC-00A90C28ABD3@zopyx.com>

Please submit a ticket to the helpdesk at europython.eu. 

-aj

Am 10.03.2014 um 23:54 schrieb Christopher Arndt <chris at chrisarndt.de>:

> I just got approved as a proposal reviewer and had a look at the list of
> proposals awaiting review. I noticed two things:
> 
> - I can't see the contents of the "Notes" field in the submission form
> for proposals listed anywhere. Since this was advertised especially as
> an opportunity to pass explanatory remarks to the reviewers, this
> omission is very unfortunate.
> 
> - I'm fairly certain that in the form to submit training proposals the
> first two text areas were labelled "Structure" and "Description" instead
> of "Abstract" and "Description" and they were in reverse order.
> 
> The result is that training proposals now contain a narrative of the
> structure in the abstract field, where reviewers would probably would
> expect a short description of (the topics of) the training, seeing that
> the section is labelled "Abstract" and is listed first.
> 
> 
> Can we please make the contents of the "Notes" field visible to the
> reviewers?
> 
> Can we label the sections in the reviewer view the same as they were
> labelled in the submission form?
> 
> Can we make sure that for trainings the right text ends up in the
> conference program (i.e. the contents of the "Description" field)?
> 
> 
> Chris
> _______________________________________________
> EuroPython 2014  Berlin, 21th27th July
> EuroPython mailing list
> EuroPython at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/europython


From info at markusholtermann.eu  Tue Mar 11 00:36:06 2014
From: info at markusholtermann.eu (Markus Holtermann)
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 00:36:06 +0100
Subject: [EuroPython] Proposal review interface
In-Reply-To: <531E42B5.1090006@chrisarndt.de>
References: <531E42B5.1090006@chrisarndt.de>
Message-ID: <20140310233606.GD15878@pyler.thinkfarm>

Hello Chris,

I'm the webteam lead for the EuroPython 2014.

First of all, thank you for your input and comments. The issues you
describe are perfectly valid, so I created 2 issues in our issue tracker
at https://github.com/EuroPython/djep/issues

On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 11:54:45PM +0100, Christopher Arndt wrote:
>- I can't see the contents of the "Notes" field in the submission form
>for proposals listed anywhere. Since this was advertised especially as
>an opportunity to pass explanatory remarks to the reviewers, this
>omission is very unfortunate.
>
>- I'm fairly certain that in the form to submit training proposals the
>first two text areas were labelled "Structure" and "Description" instead
>of "Abstract" and "Description" and they were in reverse order.
>
>The result is that training proposals now contain a narrative of the
>structure in the abstract field, where reviewers would probably would
>expect a short description of (the topics of) the training, seeing that
>the section is labelled "Abstract" and is listed first.
>
>
>Can we please make the contents of the "Notes" field visible to the
>reviewers?

https://github.com/EuroPython/djep/issues/82

>Can we label the sections in the reviewer view the same as they were
>labelled in the submission form?

https://github.com/EuroPython/djep/issues/83

>Can we make sure that for trainings the right text ends up in the
>conference program (i.e. the contents of the "Description" field)?

Well, as the fields in the proposal view are correctly labeled
(structure has the annotation about the time frames), it is first up to
the proposal author to put the description and the abstract/structure in
the correct fields. Second, the once the schedule is launched and before
the conference program is printed, we will of course try to make sure to
always include the correct text. Apart from that, the abstract /
structure field in the review's proposal update form lacks the
annotation about the time frames. Hence I created yet another issue:
https://github.com/EuroPython/djep/issues/84

Bottom line, we will fix those issues asap. But if someone on this mailing
list wants to contribute, fee free to comment on the issue and let us
know and submit a pull request.

Best,

Markus Holtermann

(EuroPython 2014 Webteam Lead)

--

EuroPython 2014 - The European Python Conference in Berlin
21-27 July 2014 at bcc Berlin Congress Center
Meet with the Python community: tutorials, talks, sprints and socializing
https://ep2014.europython.eu - @europython on Twitter

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/europython/attachments/20140311/b7130603/attachment.sig>

From chris at chrisarndt.de  Tue Mar 11 19:48:08 2014
From: chris at chrisarndt.de (Christopher Arndt)
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 19:48:08 +0100
Subject: [EuroPython] Proposal review interface
In-Reply-To: <20140310233606.GD15878@pyler.thinkfarm>
References: <531E42B5.1090006@chrisarndt.de>
 <20140310233606.GD15878@pyler.thinkfarm>
Message-ID: <531F5A68.6080500@chrisarndt.de>

On 11.03.2014 00:36, Markus Holtermann wrote:
> First of all, thank you for your input and comments. The issues
> you describe are perfectly valid, so I created 2 issues in our
> issue tracker at https://github.com/EuroPython/djep/issues

I see that one of the issues is already fixed and the others are
planned to be fixed today. Great. Let's hope that the fixes are
deployed asap, since the reviews are already in full progress.


Chris

From info at markusholtermann.eu  Tue Mar 11 21:55:12 2014
From: info at markusholtermann.eu (Markus Holtermann)
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 21:55:12 +0100
Subject: [EuroPython] Proposal review interface
In-Reply-To: <531F5A68.6080500@chrisarndt.de>
References: <531E42B5.1090006@chrisarndt.de>
 <20140310233606.GD15878@pyler.thinkfarm>
 <531F5A68.6080500@chrisarndt.de>
Message-ID: <20140311205512.GB3263@pyler.thinkfarm>

Hey there,

On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 07:48:08PM +0100, Christopher Arndt wrote:
>On 11.03.2014 00:36, Markus Holtermann wrote:
>> First of all, thank you for your input and comments. The issues
>> you describe are perfectly valid, so I created 2 issues in our
>> issue tracker at https://github.com/EuroPython/djep/issues
>
>I see that one of the issues is already fixed and the others are
>planned to be fixed today. Great. Let's hope that the fixes are
>deployed asap, since the reviews are already in full progress.

This one issue with the missing notes (#82) has been fixed and deployed
to production. The other issues will follow the next days.

Kind regards

Markus Holtermann

(EuroPython 2014 Organizer)

--

EuroPython 2014 - The European Python Conference in Berlin
21-27 July 2014 at bcc Berlin Congress Center
Meet with the Python community: tutorials, talks, sprints and socializing
https://ep2014.europython.eu - @europython on Twitter

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/europython/attachments/20140311/1de77173/attachment.sig>

From mal at europython.eu  Wed Mar 12 19:19:20 2014
From: mal at europython.eu (M.-A. Lemburg)
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 19:19:20 +0100
Subject: [EuroPython] Please sign up as reviewer for EuroPython 2014 -
	thanks !
Message-ID: <5320A528.10805@europython.eu>

There are almost 300 talk submissions in the database, but most talks
still only have one or two votes and review time is running out
quickly.

If you have some time available, please do consider signing up as
reviewer via the site's profile:

    https://ep2014.europython.eu/en/proposals/cfr/

Here's how to apply and review talks:

1. log in to your EuroPython site account (you will have created
   one when booking the conference)

2. go to your profile page:
   https://ep2014.europython.eu/en/accounts/profile/change/

3. tick the reviewer checkbox

One of the program team members will then enable upgrade your status to
reviewer (ping helpdesk at europython.eu for help if needed). Once this is
set, log in again and proceed with the reviews:

4. visit the review list:
   https://ep2014.europython.eu/en/reviews/proposals/

5. click on the title of a talk proposal, read the proposal,
   ask questions using the comment system and finally, click
   on the "create review" button to vote on the talk together
   with a short note explaining your vote

That's it.

Many thanks and see you in Berlin,
-- 
Marc-Andre Lemburg
Director
EuroPython Society
http://www.europython-society.org/

From mark at hotpy.org  Sat Mar 15 13:00:29 2014
From: mark at hotpy.org (Mark Shannon)
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 12:00:29 +0000
Subject: [EuroPython] Please sign up as reviewer for EuroPython 2014 -
 thanks !
In-Reply-To: <5320A528.10805@europython.eu>
References: <5320A528.10805@europython.eu>
Message-ID: <532440DD.5060603@hotpy.org>

Hi,

I attempted to sign up as a reviewer, as requested, but my application
was declined. No explanation why.

If you need help reviewing talks, this is *not* the way to get it.

Cheers,
Mark.

On 12/03/14 18:19, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> There are almost 300 talk submissions in the database, but most talks
> still only have one or two votes and review time is running out
> quickly.
>
> If you have some time available, please do consider signing up as
> reviewer via the site's profile:
>
>      https://ep2014.europython.eu/en/proposals/cfr/
>
> Here's how to apply and review talks:
>
> 1. log in to your EuroPython site account (you will have created
>     one when booking the conference)
>
> 2. go to your profile page:
>     https://ep2014.europython.eu/en/accounts/profile/change/
>
> 3. tick the reviewer checkbox
>
> One of the program team members will then enable upgrade your status to
> reviewer (ping helpdesk at europython.eu for help if needed). Once this is
> set, log in again and proceed with the reviews:
>
> 4. visit the review list:
>     https://ep2014.europython.eu/en/reviews/proposals/
>
> 5. click on the title of a talk proposal, read the proposal,
>     ask questions using the comment system and finally, click
>     on the "create review" button to vote on the talk together
>     with a short note explaining your vote
>
> That's it.
>
> Many thanks and see you in Berlin,
>


From mal at europython.eu  Sat Mar 15 13:17:23 2014
From: mal at europython.eu (M.-A. Lemburg)
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 13:17:23 +0100
Subject: [EuroPython] Please sign up as reviewer for EuroPython 2014 -
 thanks !
In-Reply-To: <532440DD.5060603@hotpy.org>
References: <5320A528.10805@europython.eu> <532440DD.5060603@hotpy.org>
Message-ID: <532444D3.8020702@europython.eu>

Hi Mark,

please write to the helpdesk at europython.eu to check whether this
was just a mistake (someone hitting the wrong button) or on
purpose (which I would not understand).

Note that I'm not involved in the program committee and have
no access to the Berlin system (apart from being a reviewer myself).

My email was just triggered by looking at the review listing, then
on my calendar and then thinking that the program committee
could need some extra help :-)

Thanks,
-- 
Marc-Andre Lemburg
Director
EuroPython Society
http://www.europython-society.org/


On 15.03.2014 13:00, Mark Shannon wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I attempted to sign up as a reviewer, as requested, but my application
> was declined. No explanation why.
> 
> If you need help reviewing talks, this is *not* the way to get it.
> 
> Cheers,
> Mark.
> 
> On 12/03/14 18:19, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
>> There are almost 300 talk submissions in the database, but most talks
>> still only have one or two votes and review time is running out
>> quickly.
>>
>> If you have some time available, please do consider signing up as
>> reviewer via the site's profile:
>>
>>      https://ep2014.europython.eu/en/proposals/cfr/
>>
>> Here's how to apply and review talks:
>>
>> 1. log in to your EuroPython site account (you will have created
>>     one when booking the conference)
>>
>> 2. go to your profile page:
>>     https://ep2014.europython.eu/en/accounts/profile/change/
>>
>> 3. tick the reviewer checkbox
>>
>> One of the program team members will then enable upgrade your status to
>> reviewer (ping helpdesk at europython.eu for help if needed). Once this is
>> set, log in again and proceed with the reviews:
>>
>> 4. visit the review list:
>>     https://ep2014.europython.eu/en/reviews/proposals/
>>
>> 5. click on the title of a talk proposal, read the proposal,
>>     ask questions using the comment system and finally, click
>>     on the "create review" button to vote on the talk together
>>     with a short note explaining your vote
>>
>> That's it.
>>
>> Many thanks and see you in Berlin,
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> EuroPython 2014  Berlin, 21th27th July
> EuroPython mailing list
> EuroPython at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/europython


From info at markusholtermann.eu  Sat Mar 15 13:43:07 2014
From: info at markusholtermann.eu (Markus Holtermann)
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 13:43:07 +0100
Subject: [EuroPython] Please sign up as reviewer for EuroPython 2014 -
 thanks !
In-Reply-To: <532440DD.5060603@hotpy.org>
References: <5320A528.10805@europython.eu>
 <532440DD.5060603@hotpy.org>
Message-ID: <20140315124307.GA4628@pyler.Speedport_W_723V_1_32_000>

Hey Mark,

although I'm not a part of the program committee, looking at your
profile directly shows the reason why your application has been
declined. Quoting from the Call for Reviewers page[1]:

> Please make sure that your profile describes yourself and your areas
> of expertise a bit, since we would like to disclose the list of
> reviewers to the community.

No offence, but we expect reviewers to be able to read. Not being able
to read the Call for Reviewers gives a slight impression which is not
useful for a review from my perspective.

That said, I'm sure that, after filling those fields in your profile,
you will get a positive response.

Kind regards

Markus Holtermann

(EuroPython 2014 Organizer)


[1] https://ep2014.europython.eu/en/proposals/cfr/

--

EuroPython 2014 - The European Python Conference in Berlin
21-27 July 2014 at bcc Berlin Congress Center
Meet with the Python community: tutorials, talks, sprints and socializing
https://ep2014.europython.eu - @europython on Twitter


On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 12:00:29PM +0000, Mark Shannon wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I attempted to sign up as a reviewer, as requested, but my application
>was declined. No explanation why.
>
>If you need help reviewing talks, this is *not* the way to get it.
>
>Cheers,
>Mark.
>
>On 12/03/14 18:19, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
>>There are almost 300 talk submissions in the database, but most talks
>>still only have one or two votes and review time is running out
>>quickly.
>>
>>If you have some time available, please do consider signing up as
>>reviewer via the site's profile:
>>
>>     https://ep2014.europython.eu/en/proposals/cfr/
>>
>>Here's how to apply and review talks:
>>
>>1. log in to your EuroPython site account (you will have created
>>    one when booking the conference)
>>
>>2. go to your profile page:
>>    https://ep2014.europython.eu/en/accounts/profile/change/
>>
>>3. tick the reviewer checkbox
>>
>>One of the program team members will then enable upgrade your status to
>>reviewer (ping helpdesk at europython.eu for help if needed). Once this is
>>set, log in again and proceed with the reviews:
>>
>>4. visit the review list:
>>    https://ep2014.europython.eu/en/reviews/proposals/
>>
>>5. click on the title of a talk proposal, read the proposal,
>>    ask questions using the comment system and finally, click
>>    on the "create review" button to vote on the talk together
>>    with a short note explaining your vote
>>
>>That's it.
>>
>>Many thanks and see you in Berlin,
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>EuroPython 2014  Berlin, 21th27th July
>EuroPython mailing list
>EuroPython at python.org
>https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/europython

-- 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/europython/attachments/20140315/c5b6fc99/attachment.sig>

From ep at zopyx.com  Sat Mar 15 17:47:16 2014
From: ep at zopyx.com (Andreas Jung)
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 17:47:16 +0100
Subject: [EuroPython] Please sign up as reviewer for EuroPython 2014 -
	thanks !
In-Reply-To: <20140315124307.GA4628@pyler.Speedport_W_723V_1_32_000>
References: <5320A528.10805@europython.eu> <532440DD.5060603@hotpy.org>
 <20140315124307.GA4628@pyler.Speedport_W_723V_1_32_000>
Message-ID: <7B657ECA-1A66-42AA-976A-B7A927A017C6@zopyx.com>


Am 15.03.2014 um 13:43 schrieb Markus Holtermann <info at markusholtermann.eu>:

> Hey Mark,
> 
> although I'm not a part of the program committee, looking at your
> profile directly shows the reason why your application has been
> declined. Quoting from the Call for Reviewers page[1]:
> 
>> Please make sure that your profile describes yourself and your areas
>> of expertise a bit, since we would like to disclose the list of
>> reviewers to the community.
> 

This is exactly the reason. With more than 160 reviewer requests it is just not possible
to ask a bunch of times back until a profile mets a certain minimum standard.

Andreas


From sagarsjoshi94 at gmail.com  Sat Mar 22 07:50:32 2014
From: sagarsjoshi94 at gmail.com (Sagar Joshi)
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 12:20:32 +0530
Subject: [EuroPython] EuroPython 2014
Message-ID: <CAMPf6ZscuAagOYW5T1Ci46_ucoS23dTFNgHpHt+Up573yV+pvg@mail.gmail.com>

Respected Sir/Madam,
                                         Mt name is Sagar Joshi. I am
engineering student at Indian Institute of Technology Madras (IIT-M). I
have submitted a poster proposal at EuroPython 2014 but have not got any
reviews on it yet. Is there something else I should do besides submitting
the proposal..?
I would be glad if you can help me ..

Thank you..
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/europython/attachments/20140322/72143abb/attachment.html>

From renesd at gmail.com  Sat Mar 22 10:17:59 2014
From: renesd at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ren=E9_Dudfield?=)
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 10:17:59 +0100
Subject: [EuroPython] Please sign up as reviewer for EuroPython 2014 -
 thanks !
In-Reply-To: <7B657ECA-1A66-42AA-976A-B7A927A017C6@zopyx.com>
References: <5320A528.10805@europython.eu> <532440DD.5060603@hotpy.org>
 <20140315124307.GA4628@pyler.Speedport_W_723V_1_32_000>
 <7B657ECA-1A66-42AA-976A-B7A927A017C6@zopyx.com>
Message-ID: <CAEiAHj+7mVB1Jrv+R1pP2tU+k+NwAfP9vVoJnLrZ0L2D9R5=Rw@mail.gmail.com>

Hello,

looks like the Apply to be reviewer button is gone.  Is it closed?
https://github.com/EuroPython/djep/issues/104

The interest tags from previous years were quite useful.  So people could
opt in to make public a list of things they were interested in.  So then,
it was easy to contact people of similar interests.
https://github.com/EuroPython/djep/issues/105

cheers,


On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Andreas Jung <ep at zopyx.com> wrote:

>
> Am 15.03.2014 um 13:43 schrieb Markus Holtermann <info at markusholtermann.eu
> >:
>
> > Hey Mark,
> >
> > although I'm not a part of the program committee, looking at your
> > profile directly shows the reason why your application has been
> > declined. Quoting from the Call for Reviewers page[1]:
> >
> >> Please make sure that your profile describes yourself and your areas
> >> of expertise a bit, since we would like to disclose the list of
> >> reviewers to the community.
> >
>
> This is exactly the reason. With more than 160 reviewer requests it is
> just not possible
> to ask a bunch of times back until a profile mets a certain minimum
> standard.
>
> Andreas
>
> _______________________________________________
> EuroPython 2014  Berlin, 21th27th July
> EuroPython mailing list
> EuroPython at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/europython
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/europython/attachments/20140322/435507e0/attachment.html>

From ep at zopyx.com  Sun Mar 23 13:46:43 2014
From: ep at zopyx.com (Andreas Jung)
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 13:46:43 +0100
Subject: [EuroPython] Please sign up as reviewer for EuroPython 2014 -
	thanks !
In-Reply-To: <CAEiAHj+7mVB1Jrv+R1pP2tU+k+NwAfP9vVoJnLrZ0L2D9R5=Rw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <5320A528.10805@europython.eu> <532440DD.5060603@hotpy.org>
 <20140315124307.GA4628@pyler.Speedport_W_723V_1_32_000>
 <7B657ECA-1A66-42AA-976A-B7A927A017C6@zopyx.com>
 <CAEiAHj+7mVB1Jrv+R1pP2tU+k+NwAfP9vVoJnLrZ0L2D9R5=Rw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <8F141656-8E05-4EA3-856A-91624768F0DC@zopyx.com>

Hi Ren?,

the review phase is basically over.

Andreas

Am 22.03.2014 um 10:17 schrieb Ren? Dudfield <renesd at gmail.com>:

> Hello,
> 
> looks like the Apply to be reviewer button is gone.  Is it closed?
> https://github.com/EuroPython/djep/issues/104
> 
> The interest tags from previous years were quite useful.  So people could opt in to make public a list of things they were interested in.  So then, it was easy to contact people of similar interests.
> https://github.com/EuroPython/djep/issues/105
> 
> cheers,
> 
> 
> On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Andreas Jung <ep at zopyx.com> wrote:
> 
> Am 15.03.2014 um 13:43 schrieb Markus Holtermann <info at markusholtermann.eu>:
> 
> > Hey Mark,
> >
> > although I'm not a part of the program committee, looking at your
> > profile directly shows the reason why your application has been
> > declined. Quoting from the Call for Reviewers page[1]:
> >
> >> Please make sure that your profile describes yourself and your areas
> >> of expertise a bit, since we would like to disclose the list of
> >> reviewers to the community.
> >
> 
> This is exactly the reason. With more than 160 reviewer requests it is just not possible
> to ask a bunch of times back until a profile mets a certain minimum standard.
> 
> Andreas
> 
> _______________________________________________
> EuroPython 2014  Berlin, 21th27th July
> EuroPython mailing list
> EuroPython at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/europython
> 
> _______________________________________________
> EuroPython 2014 ? Berlin, 21th?27th July
> EuroPython mailing list
> EuroPython at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/europython


From mal at europython.eu  Mon Mar 24 10:21:13 2014
From: mal at europython.eu (M.-A. Lemburg)
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 10:21:13 +0100
Subject: [EuroPython] Please sign up as reviewer for EuroPython 2014 -
 thanks !
In-Reply-To: <CAEiAHj+7mVB1Jrv+R1pP2tU+k+NwAfP9vVoJnLrZ0L2D9R5=Rw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <5320A528.10805@europython.eu>
 <532440DD.5060603@hotpy.org>	<20140315124307.GA4628@pyler.Speedport_W_723V_1_32_000>	<7B657ECA-1A66-42AA-976A-B7A927A017C6@zopyx.com>
 <CAEiAHj+7mVB1Jrv+R1pP2tU+k+NwAfP9vVoJnLrZ0L2D9R5=Rw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <532FF909.5010501@europython.eu>

Hi Ren?,

the review process has just entered the second phase to find
out which of the yet undecided talks to approve.

It's probably not a good idea to add more reviewers at this point, so
I guess that's why the program committee is not accepting new
reviewers anymore.

Thanks for your offer to help.

Cheers,
-- 
Marc-Andre Lemburg
Director
EuroPython Society
http://www.europython-society.org/


On 22.03.2014 10:17, Ren? Dudfield wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> looks like the Apply to be reviewer button is gone.  Is it closed?
> https://github.com/EuroPython/djep/issues/104
> 
> The interest tags from previous years were quite useful.  So people could
> opt in to make public a list of things they were interested in.  So then,
> it was easy to contact people of similar interests.
> https://github.com/EuroPython/djep/issues/105
> 
> cheers,
> 
> 
> On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Andreas Jung <ep at zopyx.com> wrote:
> 
>>
>> Am 15.03.2014 um 13:43 schrieb Markus Holtermann <info at markusholtermann.eu
>>> :
>>
>>> Hey Mark,
>>>
>>> although I'm not a part of the program committee, looking at your
>>> profile directly shows the reason why your application has been
>>> declined. Quoting from the Call for Reviewers page[1]:
>>>
>>>> Please make sure that your profile describes yourself and your areas
>>>> of expertise a bit, since we would like to disclose the list of
>>>> reviewers to the community.
>>>
>>
>> This is exactly the reason. With more than 160 reviewer requests it is
>> just not possible
>> to ask a bunch of times back until a profile mets a certain minimum
>> standard.
>>
>> Andreas
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> EuroPython 2014  Berlin, 21th27th July
>> EuroPython mailing list
>> EuroPython at python.org
>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/europython
>>
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> EuroPython 2014 ? Berlin, 21th?27th July
> EuroPython mailing list
> EuroPython at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/europython
>