[group-organizers] Please change this list to have public archives

[Brian Curtin]

Why would that be talked about on this list? It's about organizing user
groups, not finding jobs and speculative relocation.

So far the cases just shouldn't be happening, so optimizing for them
doesn't make sense.

On Sunday, August 2, 2015, Jason Wirth <wirth.jason at gmail.com> wrote:

> Say an organizer wants to inform other organizers she is considering other
> jobs that would require relocation and there's a chance (not a certainty)
> of her moving. She might not want this information (and all derivative
> conversation) publicly available for her employer to know about.
>
> On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 8:10 PM Brian Ray <brianhray at gmail.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','brianhray at gmail.com');>> wrote:
>
>> Agreed on "why keep it private?" On topics of sensitivity, it is just
>> common sense. Those wouldn't be well handled in group forum anyway.
>>
>> The child care thing, well... I don't know how exactly to do it. I pretty
>> much want to make it happen. Having two kids, as a single dad, I actually
>> must need to make it happen for our next monthly meeting. However, it is
>> tough because involves not just cost, but liability. For example, if I say
>> on a public forum like this one we will take all the kids to lollapalooza
>> (a pretty wild music fest in chicago that tries hard to be kid friendly but
>> sometime fails as it's full of 100 of thousand drunk teenagers), and
>> something bad happens, well, someone can point to this conversation as in
>> internet archive and say I was potentially responsible.
>>
>> I think we are all saying the same thing. We like public data, open data,
>> transparency... but that all changes quickly when something goes wrong.
>>
>> Nonetheless, I already change the setting, so...
>>
>> BR
>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/group-organizers/attachments/20150802/8c13d566/attachment.html>