[group-organizers] Please change this list to have public archives

Trey Hunner trey at treyhunner.com
Fri Jul 31 02:25:02 CEST 2015

On 07/30/2015 09:16 AM, Carol Willing wrote:
> On 7/30/15 9:13 AM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
>> On 30.07.2015 18:11, sheila miguez wrote:
>>> I'm +1 since other organizer groups do it and because there isn't years
>>> worth of private history. In mailing lists with years worth of private
>>> history, I'd be -1.
>> +1 as well.
> +1 as well. Public archives are a valuable resource for sharing
> knowledge with *potential* group organizers.

+1 also.  It seems like the majority of the discussions on this list
could be made public.

It would also be nice to have a place to discuss matters that should
remain private, but that seems like a secondary need.  Personally, I
usually feel more comfortable discussing sensitive matters in private
chats rather than email lists.

>>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Brian Ray <brianhray at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> -1
>>>> I am not sure I agree with the change in the setting for group
>>>> organizers
>>>> as we may want to discuss things we (as group organizers) want to
>>>> discuss
>>>> with other group organizers before proposing to a public forum.
>>>> However, I
>>>> would love to hear what others think.
>>>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 11:32 AM, sheila miguez <shekay at pobox.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> I've wanted to provide links to posts for people multiple times
>>>>> now, and
>>>>> can't.

Trey Hunner

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://mail.python.org/mailman/private/group-organizers/attachments/20150730/95f27ca8/attachment.sig>

More information about the Group-Organizers mailing list