[I18n-sig] Re: pygettext.py extraction of docstrings
Barry A. Warsaw
barry@wooz.org
Tue, 19 Jun 2001 15:52:35 -0400
>>>>> "MvL" == Martin v Loewis <martin@loewis.home.cs.tu-berlin.de> writes:
>> But the po-file format documentation doesn't say that
>> additional flags can be defined for #, comments. It seems to
>> me a simple omission in the documentation, right? Is the
>> intent of #, flags that the extraction tools can define
>> additional, language-specific flags?
MvL> I'd say that nobody has thought of that. Bruno is probably
MvL> the person to give a definitive yay or nay here, but I'd hope
MvL> that tools shouldn't go into flames if they see an extra
MvL> flag. Atleast GNU msgmerge does not show any concern.
MvL> Of course, it would be better if this possibility could be
MvL> codified somewhere, and if gettext.texi could serve as the
MvL> repository of well-known flags - even if they don't all have
MvL> a meaning to GNU gettext. Adding such documentation is
MvL> probably an issue of submitting patches against gettext.texi.
I'm trying to close this issue out (along with the associated SF
patch). Since I haven't heard otherwise from Bruno, I'm going to
change the output to produce "#, docstring" flags.
-Barry