[I18n-sig] JapaneseCodecs 1.4.8 released
Thu, 5 Sep 2002 18:46:24 +0900
Tamito KAJIYAMA <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
| The only one reason for choosing the Microsoft mapping is that
| it seems better. The Consortium's mapping has a problem that
| both 0x5c and 0x815f in Shift_JIS are mapped to U+005c, which
| is in turn mapped to 0x5c in Shift_JIS. In other words, the
| Consortium's mapping is one-to-many. On the other hand, the
| Microsoft's mapping is one-to-one. There is no conversion
| problem like the one in the Consortium's mapping. That's why
| I think the Microsoft's mapping is better.
One addition: the mapping used in Java is also one-to-one so
that it may be another candidate. I'm not sure at the moment
which mapping should be picked. Any suggestions are welcome.
KAJIYAMA, Tamito <email@example.com>