[Idle-dev] tempfile.py

[Kurt B. Kaiser]

[GvR]

> Better not track that one.  It's better if Idlefork runs with Python
> 2.2(.1) -- I assume it still does, right?
> 
> If with 2.3 it causes a warning on its use of mktemp, you might add a
> filterwarnings() call to suppress that.

[Mats Wichman]

> I care if idle(fork) becomes 2.2-incompatible.  I don't care much
> about 2.1.  Just wanted to know that it had been thought through;
> since there's more than // involved the choice has been made anyway.

The intention is to support 2.2, but not 2.1.

I don't think that Stephen and I have intentionally written anything
which restricts Idlefork to 2.3.  However, I do run 2.3a0.  Maybe I
should drop back to 2.2. to better test compliance.

Regards, KBK