[Idle-dev] [Python-Dev] Removing IDLE from the standard library

Michael Foord fuzzyman at voidspace.org.uk
Mon Jul 12 20:36:03 CEST 2010


On 12/07/2010 19:21, Ian Bicking wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 3:38 PM, Ron Adam <rrr at ronadam.com 
> <mailto:rrr at ronadam.com>> wrote:
>
>     There might be another alternative.
>
>     Both idle and pydoc are applications (are there others?) that are
>     in the standard library.  As such, they or parts of them, are
>     possibly importable to other projects.  That restricts changes
>     because a committer needs to consider the chances that a change
>     may break something else.
>
>     I suggest they be moved out of the lib directory, but still be
>     included with python.  (Possibly in the tools directory.)  That
>     removes some of the backward compatibility restrictions or at
>     least makes it clear there isn't a need for backward compatibility.
>
>
> I also like this idea.  This means Python comes with an IDE "out of he 
> box" but without the overhead of a management and release process that 
> is built for something very different than a GUI program (the standard 
> library).  This would mean that IDLE would be in site-packages, could 
> easily be upgraded using normal tools, and maybe most importantly it 
> could have its own community tools and development process that is 
> more casual (and can more easily integrate new contributors) and 
> higher velocity of changes and releases.  Python releases would then 
> ship the most recent stable release of IDLE.
>
IDLE itself is probably stable enough that being able to "upgrade in 
place" is not a high priority. That could change based on this thread of 
course.

I would *really* support this approach with "pip" once distutils2 is 
complete and integrated into the standard library. I would really like 
Python to come with a capable package manager "out of the box" but 
understand your reluctance to tie pip to the Python release schedule. 
Having pip installed into site-packages by default, so that it *can* be 
upgraded in place, would be win-win as far as I can tell. Slight thread 
hijacking I realise... :-)

All the best,

Michael

> -- 
> Ian Bicking  | http://blog.ianbicking.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/fuzzyman%40voidspace.org.uk
>    


-- 
http://www.ironpythoninaction.com/
http://www.voidspace.org.uk/blog

READ CAREFULLY. By accepting and reading this email you agree, on behalf of your employer, to release me from all obligations and waivers arising from any and all NON-NEGOTIATED agreements, licenses, terms-of-service, shrinkwrap, clickwrap, browsewrap, confidentiality, non-disclosure, non-compete and acceptable use policies (”BOGUS AGREEMENTS”) that I have entered into with your employer, its partners, licensors, agents and assigns, in perpetuity, without prejudice to my ongoing rights and privileges. You further represent that you have the authority to release me from any BOGUS AGREEMENTS on behalf of your employer.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/idle-dev/attachments/20100712/44675399/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the IDLE-dev mailing list