[Image-SIG] Re: PIL's configure bug -- from 2002

[Fredrik Lundh]

Terry Hancock wrote:

> And if I had access to your original configure.in, I could probably
> figure out why and fix it. That file is missing from the so-called "source"
> distribution of a so-called "open source" package, which was very
> frustrating to me, and should bother the maintainer too.  Don't you
> think so, too?   This violates published standards for both "free
> software" and "open source software" definitions (generated
> intermediate files are not "source code").  Surely it does so
> accidentally, right?

Hint: with that attitude, it's very easy to ignore you.

</F>