[Image-SIG] downscaling by area averaging
douglas at paradise.net.nz
Sat May 7 03:54:28 CEST 2005
I've added stretched versions to
unscaled, area averaged, anti-aliased, and nearest-neighbour-stetched
> + I'm beginning to wonder if there's not an off-by-something error
> lurking somewhere in stretch. hmm...
In my tests, all the resize and stretch filters appear to shift the
image down and to the right by about half an output pixel. Assuming my
controls images are right...
>>Interestingly, the area averaged image is generally pixel perfect with
>>the Gimp's best resizing ("Cubic").
> that's odd.
Without looking, I think it must be adaptive, but is called cubic
because that is an ancient photoshop keyword for "the best possible".
More information about the Image-SIG