[Import-sig] deprecate ihooks?
Fri, 4 Feb 2000 01:27:51 -0800 (PST)
On Thu, 3 Feb 2000, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> Maybe I didn't explain it well enough. I think ihooks actually has a
> better base architecture than your imputil (except it's missing the
> import manager, which is a separate thing anyway).
Ah! Now we get to it :-)
I'd love to hear any feedback that you have on imputil. I've received some
from a few others that is awaiting incorporation.
How would you like to do this to minimize your review time? Should I fold
in the other feedback first (to eliminate duplicate feedback)? Do you want
to do a quick, high-level feedback? Or go for broke with a fully detailed
It may also be constructive to compare it against the requirements for a
new import mechanism that you set up in:
Initial requirements list:
My response, with imputil in mind:
Your response and modified requirements:
I'll get my Python page updated in a moment with a pointer to the CVS
version of imputil. For reference: http://www.lyra.org/greg/python/
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/