[Import-sig] Proposal for a modified import mechanism.
Prabhu Ramachandran
Prabhu Ramachandran <prabhu@cyberwaveindia.com>
Sat, 10 Nov 2001 14:00:25 +0530
Hi,
Sorry about the cross posting.
Over the last couple of weeks I described a problem and inconsistency
with the way Python imports modules. For more details look at this
thread:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2001-November/070719.html
In short, currently, import allows one to use non-absolute module
names for modules that are in the current directory. If a module is
not in the same directory, import then looks for modules in sys.path.
Consequently, dealing with packages that are re-nested is a pain.
Complex package structure also causes problems. I'd like to note that
I was also not the only person who suffered from this issue -- four
others on mentioned similar problems and some asked me to let them
know if I found a solution.
Subsequently, I proposed another approach that first looks in the
local directory and then walks up the current package tree looking for
modules before looking at sys.path. I also modified knee.py to obtain
a working solution. More information is here:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2001-November/071212.html
the threading is messed up and starts here:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2001-November/071218.html
You can find the new module and a simple test package here:
http://av.stanford.edu/~prabhu/download/
There is also a slightly enhanced version of knee.py included that
supports caching module lookup failures suggested by Rainer and Gordon
in:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2001-November/071218.html
it also fixes a bug where the parent package is an extension module.
I therefore have a working import style that seems to handle importing
packages in a more natural(?) and consistent(?) manner. I've also
tested it out with a large package like scipy (http://www.scipy.org)
with no trouble or significant performance problems:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2001-November/071325.html
I'd like to ask the Python developers if they'd consider
(a) changing the way the current import works to do what I
proposed, or,
(b) add a new keyword like 'rimport' (or something) that does this
recursive search through parent packages and loads modules. This
was actually suggested by Gordon McMillan. Gordon actually
suggested something stronger -- import only supports absolute
names, rimport is relative import and rrimport is a recursive
relative import. But this would break the current import since
import currently aupports some relative lookup. So maybe import
and rimport is a workable solution?
(c) patch the existing knee.py with my fixes. Note: these fixes
have nothing to do with the recirsive module lookup stuff --
knee.py is merely an improved version of the older one.
Thanks for listening patiently and sorry again for all the cross
posting.
prabhu