[Import-SIG] What if namespace imports weren't special?
barry at python.org
Mon Jul 11 16:32:13 CEST 2011
On Jul 10, 2011, at 11:57 PM, P.J. Eby wrote:
>I'm noticing, though, that the more I hear "partitioned package", the less I
>like it, and the more I wish I hadn't proposed it. ;-)
>It's fundamentally wrong, because (e.g.) peak.util is *not* a single thing
>that's been partitioned, *even though* it started out that way.
>It's just a bunch of things with a common namespace, and ISTM the name
>*really* ought to reflect that.
>Common namespace packages? Shared namespace packages? Surname packages? ;-)
Does 'package portions' not fit the bill?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Import-SIG