[Import-SIG] PEP 420: Implicit Namespace Packages
ericsnowcurrently at gmail.com
Thu Apr 19 23:21:32 CEST 2012
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Eric V. Smith <eric at trueblade.com> wrote:
> This reflects (I hope!) the discussions at PyCon. My plan is to produce
> an implementation based on the importlib code, and then flush out pieces
> of the PEP.
> In particular, I want to make sure the PEP addresses the various
> objections that were raised, especially by Nick.
Nice work, Eric. PEP 420 is quite clear. I appreciate that not many
words are spent on contrasting it with PEP 402. I agree that the PEP
needs to be clear on Nick's concerns, one way or the other (especially
as they relate to PEP 395). I don't recall any satisfactory
resolution on that. Looking forward to hearing more on this.
p.s. how often do the PEPs get rebuilt? I saw the PEP as it came
across the commits list, but it's not showing up on the site.
More information about the Import-SIG