[Import-SIG] Namespace Packages resolution
ncoghlan at gmail.com
Tue Mar 13 04:17:59 CET 2012
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Carl Meyer <carl at oddbird.net> wrote:
> If this is indeed the proposed algorithm, then I think the "backwards
> compatibility" item on Nick's list of objections is unfounded. The new
> behavior will only occur in situations that would previously have
> resulted in an ImportError.
The complaint that it's a complicated hack that is only necessary to
cope with the lack of explicit package markers still stands, though.
(But yes, I was definitely going off the parenthetical comment rather
than the earlier description that contradicted that part).
Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
More information about the Import-SIG