[Inpycon] Society vs. trust
Kenneth Gonsalves
lawgon at thenilgiris.com
Mon Oct 26 01:28:51 CET 2009
On Sunday 25 Oct 2009 9:44:04 pm Noufal Ibrahim wrote:
> Now I see why people don't like law/lawyers. :)
when I was practising law, I had a friend who would frequently make comments
like the above - basically he was of the view that all lawyers are sharks and
are uninterested in justice. Then one day he was caught for not wearing a
helmet when riding his bike. He came to me to represent him. Actually he
always used to wear a helmet, but on that day he forgot. Unfortunately for him
this is a statutory offence and 'forgot' is not a defence. But there was a
loophole which I could exploit - so I asked him: 'do you want to get off or do
you want justice?' You can easily guess his reply.
> Is there a document somewhere describing the pros and cons of a trust
> vs. society?
>
> >From what I've gleaned from the conversations here, a society is more
>
> transparent and would work better for our purposes but a trust is
> quicker and simpler. Is there anything else I should be aware of? The
> lawyer himself recommends a trust since it's easier to setup up and
> run.
yes - very easy. What is not easy is unseating the trustees. A trust is used
when the trustee/trustees control the source of funds - and do not want others
to have authority over the funds. This is not the case here.
--
regards
kg
http://lawgon.livejournal.com
More information about the Inpycon
mailing list