[Inpycon] committee resolution
Kenneth Gonsalves
lawgon at au-kbc.org
Thu Apr 15 08:47:20 CEST 2010
On Thursday 15 Apr 2010 11:59:51 am Anand Balachandran Pillai wrote:
> > there are two vice-presidents - you and vivek
>
> Is that a redundant design ? I have seen this in clustered systems
> where you have a backup or a failover ? Otherwise I don't see
> the point of having two VPs for a budding organization.
most organisations have two vice-presidents. Many have more than two. Anyway
this has been discussed threadbare in the run up to registration.
>
> Please downgrade me to committe member or something.
> This is ridiculous.
>
this can only be done by amending the byelaw in the AGM
<rant>
when I found that there was little to no discussion on the byelaws, I was
congratulating myself on my brilliant drafting - I now find that the reason for
no discussion is that no one one has bothered to go through the bye-laws. And
now, suddenly people ask things like 'why should corporates have a vote?',
'what is student subscription?', 'how many office bearers?'. Very disheartening.
Please take a few minutes out to read the byelaws, note what you do not like
in them and we can always amend them in the AGM.
</rant>
--
regards
Kenneth Gonsalves
Senior Associate
NRC-FOSS
http://certificate.nrcfoss.au-kbc.org.in
More information about the Inpycon
mailing list