noufal at gmail.com
Sat Jun 5 08:05:34 CEST 2010
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Kenneth Gonsalves <lawgon at au-kbc.org> wrote:
> you have not got the point I am making. The point is that we have to decide
> the following:
> 1. are proposals public or not
Nope. They get mailed/uploaded, a committee reviews them and it's
over. The junta doesn't have a say in picking/commenting on proposals.
> 2. who reviews them
The committee which we're trying to set up. Anand Pillai is one of the
members and more are welcome.
> 3. who makes the final decision
We'll appoint someone to *head* it. Anand has already started work on
the CFP so if he's willing to own this up, it'd be perfect.
> 4. is there to be interaction with the author before a final decision is taken
Case by case basis although I see no reason why not to do this.
More information about the Inpycon