noufal at gmail.com
Sat Jun 5 08:58:32 CEST 2010
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Kenneth Gonsalves <lawgon at au-kbc.org> wrote:
> not really a question of being democratic. It is rather that the conference is
> in its initial stages - not like a well established conference like pycon
> where there are thousands of aspiring speakers. Here speakers would like to
> see who else has proposed talks and on what - the 'junta' would also like to
> see what kind of interest is being generated and what kind of level of speaker
> participation is going to be at. A lot of people who have something to say are
> diffident about it - but when they see X is proposing some sort of talk and then
> they say: If that guy can talk - so can I.
This makes a lot of sense. Thanks.
Once Anand comes out with the CFP, we'll see how we can structure this
so that the proposals are publicised properly.
More information about the Inpycon