[Inpycon] CFP draft for review
noufal at gmail.com
Fri Jun 11 08:56:55 CEST 2010
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Anand Balachandran Pillai <
abpillai at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Summary. (summary of your talk in less than 100 words).
>> Description (describe your talk in detail for reviewers)
>> I'm not quite happy with the the description of the "description"
>> field. Any suggestions?
> The current description looks fine to me. Actually you don't need
> a description of the description. Just do as follows.
> Outline (A detailed outline of your talk, for reviewers only)
> Notes (Notes for reviewers, if any)
Isn't this a little redundant? Why a separate notes field? We'll have one
box called "Description" or "Detailed outline" which contains the outline
along with notes for the reviewers.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Inpycon