[Inpycon] Is PyCon India "really open"?

[Peeyush Aggarwal]

On 13-Jan-2018 2:11 AM, "vijay kumar" <vnbang2003 at gmail.com> wrote:



On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 1:55 AM, Bibhas Ch Debnath <me at bibhas.in> wrote:

>
>
> On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 1:39 AM, vijay kumar <vnbang2003 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 1:29 AM, Bibhas Ch Debnath <me at bibhas.in> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Vijay,
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 1:22 AM, vijay kumar <vnbang2003 at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 1:10 AM, Anuvrat Parashar <anuvrat at anuvrat.in>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 1:13 AM, Noufal Ibrahim KV <
>>>>> noufal at nibrahim.net.in> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, Jan 13 2018, vijay kumar wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > Now that you says you didn't know anything, Are you correct to
>>>>>> approve
>>>>>> > PR ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> An "LGTM" is not an approval.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > I Personally would not recommend anyone doing anyone.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What exactly are you trying to say here?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think we can resolve this quite easily.  Why don't you point
>>>>>> everyone
>>>>>> on this list to the exact damage that he caused because he "didn't
>>>>>> know
>>>>>> anything"? If his LGTM actually legitimises a bad commit, then there's
>>>>>> some substance to what you're saying. Please show us if this is the
>>>>>> case.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I dont think someone approving PR without knwoledge is right anywhere.
>>>> He should have atleast asked someone before approving it in case he
>>>> didn't know anything.
>>>> I would never recommend anyone this.
>>>>
>>>
>>> ​
>>> ​​
>>> Did you read any of the mails sent by others in this thread?
>>>
>> First discusison happendin in Meeting , MOM had been published in mailing
>> list.
>> Next steps volunteer take based on thier comfort communication channel as
>> it basically 1:1 discussions mainly.
>>
>
> Where is this documented? How would anyone starting to contribute now,
> know the history of conversation? Ask all previous volunteers for their 1:1
> conversation log? That really doesn't seem like an open discussion to me.
>

Do we maintain log of each discussion done offline . Which year was it done
?


If the offline discussion or meeting is has any necessary info that
community needs to know, I personally sent all the minutes of meeting with
IMPORTANT INFO in it over the mailing list.

One of the volunteer wrote email on volunteering and gave reference to this
blog : https://in.pycon.org/blog/2015/volunteering-for-pycon-india-2015.html
Hope that answer you.


It answers none of the issues and concerns raised about the harsh and
immature decision taken.




> And Shashank said he's been contributing for 3 years now, that doesn't
> qualify him to write LGTM on a blog post? Writing LGTM got him this comment?
> - "I don't think you are part of volunteering Team for this year so please
> stop reviewing it."
>


>
> There are people in IRC *right now* saying that they're afraid of
> reviewing further PRs. Do you see what you did wrong?
>
I corrected wrong thing.


It's only you who thinks that right now. As you always say

Let the community decide.



>

_______________________________________________
Inpycon mailing list
Inpycon at python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/inpycon
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/inpycon/attachments/20180113/63c5273b/attachment-0001.html>