[Inpycon] Is PyCon India "really open"?

[Peeyush Aggarwal]

On 17-Jan-2018 10:56 PM, "Vanitha Shanmugam" <vani.pree at gmail.com> wrote:



On 17 January 2018 at 21:28, Peeyush Aggarwal <peeyushaggarwal94 at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
> On 17-Jan-2018 7:14 PM, "Vanitha Shanmugam" <vani.pree at gmail.com> wrote
>
> [...]
> I would like an explanation for this. I request you to be mindful of what
> you speak here. On what basis did you pass this comment? If I do not have
> rights to clarify things here, I would like to know the criteria on which
> the
>
>
> Well, since you have asked the community, I am not sure if Anuvrat is
> right or not. I also don't care. But I will say what I think
>
> You asked if he thinks you can write a mail on your own or not. I think
> you can.
>

May I request you to read the email again. I never asked 'if I "can"
write'. Request you not to read what you want but what is in the email
actually.


I read this

"You think I cannot write a mail on my own or do not have rights to clarify
things here?"

Make your own judgement



> You are definitely writing. It was his personal opinion.
>

As a core team member, I clarified things. Once again, request you to read
all my emails in this thread if you want more details.


Not much interested in putting that time.



> The way it was everyone's in thinking what Vijay said was wrong and the
> way Vijay thought that what he did was well within basic etiquettes. He did
> not even run his mouth. Simple yes. You can show protest or simply respect
> his opinion as well. Your choice.
>
> As far as the clarify thingy goes, the action which was discussed was
> taken by Vijay. So he should have clarified his deeds.
>


> You always advocate for the deeds of others.
>

May I ask how you came up to this conclusion that I 'always' advocate for
other's deeds? First of all, I don't know you and you pass such a comment!
Please mind your words.


I ain't minding my words. You here is referring an idiomatic reference. It
is not directed at you in any way. The reference is to any person. I , me ,
the "you" and everyone else.



> Clarification is given by someone who needs to.
>

If thats the case, you should not clarify when I had requested Anuvrat. I
never asked for an explanation from the community on Anuvrat's statements
but for not reacting on his statements.Request you to read emails completely


I am not clarifying. I am presenting my views.



>
> So yes, you surely have all the rights to present your opinion which you
> definitely did.
>
> I hope even my opinion would be respected.
>

I respect your opinions but don't pass judgement on me, you do not have
rights.


I didn't . You are free to make assumptions and interpretations.


In case this is hurting anyone, I am expressing my apologies in advance.
>

Offending someone and then asking for an apology!
Would seniors of this community take any actions on such behaviour to
support everyone here or only a selective people will be defended by the
community?


_______________________________________________
Inpycon mailing list
Inpycon at python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/inpycon
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/inpycon/attachments/20180117/4b011b38/attachment.html>