[Inpycon] Is PyCon India "really open"?

[JISHNU BHATTACHARYA]

Hi :
One quick question - since joining for past few days getting these long
mails.

1. How  add my deck if I am interested  for presentation.
2. How to work as volunteer

On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 9:28 AM, Kumar Anirudha via Inpycon <
inpycon at python.org> wrote:

> First, Apologies for Top posting.
>
> It’s been like a week since this thread started of what could have been a
> simple case of miscommunication and be handled swiftly and quitely.
>
> Most of the people here, I’ve met at various editions of PyCon India.
> Chandan and Sayan amongst others are amongst the most cool headed guys I’ve
> ever met personally. What we all can agree is that we want a great PyCon
> India 2018. For that to happen, the only people who were working hard
> towards it, after their day job and everything have now withdrawn. As of
> now, nobody’s working for PyCon India 2018. I myself was trying to
> contribute and volunteer on multiple fronts with as much time as I can make
> for it and now have lost all interest in entirety towards it.
>
> A lot of apologies and accusations have been made already. Please, let
> this thread be stopped now. This is not contributing towards anything
> positive and only increases hatred. I believe we’re smart enough to
> understand the difference.
>
> Personally, I’d request Chandan, Sayan, Vijay and Vanitha to reconsider
> their decisions and resume their roles. We can have an e-meeting on
> Bluejeans or Zoom, led by Chandan as usual and anybody who still has
> problem with them leading can come up and speak out instead of wasting any
> more of our time.
>
> It’s just disappointing to see all this fall apart like this.
>
> Cheers
> Kumar Anirudha
>
> On Wednesday, January 17, 2018, 11:16 PM, Peeyush Aggarwal <
> peeyushaggarwal94 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 17-Jan-2018 10:56 PM, "Vanitha Shanmugam" <vani.pree at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 17 January 2018 at 21:28, Peeyush Aggarwal <peeyushaggarwal94 at gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>
>
> On 17-Jan-2018 7:14 PM, "Vanitha Shanmugam" <vani.pree at gmail.com> wrote
>
> [...]
> I would like an explanation for this. I request you to be mindful of what
> you speak here. On what basis did you pass this comment? If I do not have
> rights to clarify things here, I would like to know the criteria on which
> the
>
>
> Well, since you have asked the community, I am not sure if Anuvrat is
> right or not. I also don't care. But I will say what I think
>
> You asked if he thinks you can write a mail on your own or not. I think
> you can.
>
>
> May I request you to read the email again. I never asked 'if I "can"
> write'. Request you not to read what you want but what is in the email
> actually.
>
>
> I read this
>
> "You think I cannot write a mail on my own or do not have rights to
> clarify things here?"
>
> Make your own judgement
>
>
>
> You are definitely writing. It was his personal opinion.
>
>
> As a core team member, I clarified things. Once again, request you to read
> all my emails in this thread if you want more details.
>
>
> Not much interested in putting that time.
>
>
>
> The way it was everyone's in thinking what Vijay said was wrong and the
> way Vijay thought that what he did was well within basic etiquettes. He did
> not even run his mouth. Simple yes. You can show protest or simply respect
> his opinion as well. Your choice.
>
> As far as the clarify thingy goes, the action which was discussed was
> taken by Vijay. So he should have clarified his deeds.
>
>
>
> You always advocate for the deeds of others.
>
>
> May I ask how you came up to this conclusion that I 'always' advocate for
> other's deeds? First of all, I don't know you and you pass such a comment!
> Please mind your words.
>
>
> I ain't minding my words. You here is referring an idiomatic reference. It
> is not directed at you in any way. The reference is to any person. I , me ,
> the "you" and everyone else.
>
>
>
> Clarification is given by someone who needs to.
>
>
> If thats the case, you should not clarify when I had requested Anuvrat. I
> never asked for an explanation from the community on Anuvrat's statements
> but for not reacting on his statements.Request you to read emails completely
>
>
> I am not clarifying. I am presenting my views.
>
>
>
>
> So yes, you surely have all the rights to present your opinion which you
> definitely did.
>
> I hope even my opinion would be respected.
>
>
> I respect your opinions but don't pass judgement on me, you do not have
> rights.
>
>
> I didn't . You are free to make assumptions and interpretations.
>
>
> In case this is hurting anyone, I am expressing my apologies in advance.
>
>
> Offending someone and then asking for an apology!
> Would seniors of this community take any actions on such behaviour to
> support everyone here or only a selective people will be defended by the
> community?
>
>
> ______________________________ _________________
> Inpycon mailing list
> Inpycon at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/ mailman/listinfo/inpycon
> <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/inpycon>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Inpycon mailing list
> Inpycon at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/inpycon
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Inpycon mailing list
> Inpycon at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/inpycon
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/inpycon/attachments/20180118/b21b5ba6/attachment-0001.html>