[IPython-dev] Release plans, yet again. And a road to 1.0, believe it or not.
ellisonbg at gmail.com
Fri Apr 8 12:14:47 EDT 2011
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 6:16 AM, Thomas Kluyver <takowl at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 8 April 2011 08:55, Fernando Perez <fperez.net at gmail.com> wrote:
>> - 0.11: we now have no pending pull requests and just a few critical
> Let's go into some more detail on what we need to do for 0.11:
> - We wanted to revise the config system, which I think Brian was working on.
I will coordinate with Fernando on this. Once this is done, it will
take some work to update the top level ipython programs.
> - Resolving history performance issues (me)
> - General testing.
> Critical bugs:
> - 336: Missing figure development/figs/iopubfade.png for docs (Min; should
> be an easy fix)
> - 8: Ensure %gui qt works with new Mayavi and pylab (Fernando, I think you
> were looking into this at sage days. You've commented there that you want
> Brian's input.)
> - 297: Shouldn't use pexpect for subprocesses in in-process terminal
> frontend (Reported by Min, no comments there yet)
> - 175: Qt console needs configuration support (Brian, is this part of your
> config plans?)
> - 66: Update the main What's New document to reflect work on 0.11 (Brian,
> [Seems it would almost be easier to write a What's not new document!]
> There are 12 high priority bugs
> (https://github.com/ipython/ipython/issues/labels/prio-high). Should any of
> these be considered blocking?
I consider 291 a blocker, but it will be easy to fix. I plan on
working on that soon.
> Anything else that I've missed?
> IPython-dev mailing list
> IPython-dev at scipy.org
Brian E. Granger
Cal Poly State University, San Luis Obispo
bgranger at calpoly.edu and ellisonbg at gmail.com
More information about the IPython-dev