[IPython-dev] Helping battle testing the newapp branch
benjaminrk at gmail.com
Tue Jun 21 12:20:47 EDT 2011
On Jun 21, 2011, at 9:12, Robert Kern <robert.kern at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 6/21/11 10:23 AM, Min RK wrote:
>> On Jun 21, 2011, at 1:05, Fernando Perez<fperez.net at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 9:22 PM, MinRK<benjaminrk at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> newapp has been merged into master.
>>> BTW, I think we should add back the (ugly, I know) special-case of
>>> honoring -pylab with a single dash. We've talked about this before,
>>> while it's ugly, this is written in *many* places, including books and
>>> published papers, as the way to start ipython with plotting/numerical
>>> support. I think it's worth the friendliness to users who arrive via
>>> that path to have that option just work, even if it means an ugly two
>>> lines of code special-casing '-pylab' in sys.argv...
>> It doesn't have to be ugly - we could easily allow flags to be specified with one or two leading '-'. Currently, one '-' cannot be valid, so it is safe to allow it.
> Well, '-pylab' gets parsed the same as '-p ylab'. Maybe just add an alias "ylab"
> for the pylab profile?
-pylab is rejected as an invalid argument, just as anything prefixed with just one leading '-'. Flags currently require a '--' prefix, but that is entirely artificial. Allowing the shorter leading '-' is a trivial change, and might ease the transition for people.
> Robert Kern
> "I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma
> that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had
> an underlying truth."
> -- Umberto Eco
> IPython-dev mailing list
> IPython-dev at scipy.org
More information about the IPython-dev