[IPython-dev] msg spec

[MinRK]

On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 18:58, Fernando Perez <fperez.net at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 6:57 PM, Jason Grout
> <jason-sage at creativetrax.com> wrote:
> > Like the Sage preparser, right?
>
> Yes, that's precisely what I had in mind...
>

I'm fine leaving it in the payload system.  Having it in the actual reply
does make some sense.  Isn't it fairly clear the point immediately prior to
execution?  I don't know where precisely this is

Another msg spec failure, along my way:

We do not actually support the detail_level key in the object_info messages
(on either end), so presumably we are only doing detail_level=0.  Also the
spec doc suggests the only options are 1 and 2, but the default is in fact
0, and this is the only one we currently expose.

I presume just adding the arg to KM.object_info, and passing it to
inspector.info in Kernel.object_info_request is all that we need to do.


> _______________________________________________
> IPython-dev mailing list
> IPython-dev at scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/ipython-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/ipython-dev/attachments/20120417/fa87a6e1/attachment.html>