[IPython-dev] Bumping up priority of thinking about output scrolling/control

Fernando Perez fperez.net at gmail.com
Thu May 31 23:30:32 EDT 2012


On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 8:22 PM, Brian Granger <ellisonbg at gmail.com> wrote:
> i can look into this.  But the other option for the output of multiple
> engines is to build a simple widget that has a slider and allows you
> the slide through the output of the different engines.  But I agree
> that we need a more general solution to this issue.

I think it's worth thining about the clean solution for the long run:
Titus had examples that were unmanageable even without any
parallelism, simply because of very long running code that had super
verbose stdout.  Without something to manage output size, his demos
would have been simply impossible.  He actually did the public demos
off Min's quick branch, but that's not a long-term solution :)

So let's see what we can do for a clean solution we're happy with that
applies even in the absence of multiple engines.  Obviously your idea
could also be quite useful for that case, but let's first think about
what to do with stdout of absurd lengths...

Cheers,

f



More information about the IPython-dev mailing list