[IPython-dev] 0.13.2
David Verelst
david.verelst at gmail.com
Fri Mar 15 04:56:43 EDT 2013
On 14 March 2013 21:38, MinRK <benjaminrk at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 7:23 AM, David Verelst <david.verelst at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just want to mention that due to the issue #2831<https://github.com/ipython/ipython/issues/2831>IPython fails to start with PyQt 4.10. This case occurs for the next Ubuntu
>> release (13.04), future Fedora (scheduled for June), and is already current
>> in Arch Linux.
>>
>
> And that's precisely why it is backported to 0.13.2. We will start the
> release cycle after PyCon / PyData - if there's a reason to hasten the
> release (e.g. 13.04 deadlines), I am fine calling the current state of
> 0.13.x an RC.
>
There was a very similar bug in Spyder 2.1.13 (
https://code.google.com/p/spyderlib/issues/detail?id=1302), and a few days
a ago bug fix release solved that issue. However, Ubuntu decided to wait (
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/spyder/+bug/1153216) for Debian
before upgrading and applied a patch instead. So I have no idea if it makes
sense to rush for Ubuntu if they don't plan to use the release. On the
other hand, I assume IPython carries more weight than Spyder. So far I
can't see anyone reported this bug at Ubuntu:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipython. For Arch Linux it makes
sense to get 0.13.2 out of the door, but that's because I am using that :-)
(note: I just build the 0.13.x branch to solve the issue).
>
>
>>
>> Since this is my first message on this list, I just want to show my
>> appreciation for this great piece of software by shouting: Thanks!
>>
>
> Much appreciated!
>
>
>
>>
>> Best regards,
>> David
>>
>>
>> On 14 March 2013 03:36, MinRK <benjaminrk at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Mar 13, 2013, at 14:46, Jonathan March <JDM at MarchRay.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Min et al,
>>>> It looks like the backport-0.13.2 issue queue was emptied 3 days ago --
>>>> impressive feat, Min.
>>>
>>>
>>> I actually wrote the queue at the same time as applying the patches, so
>>> perhaps not so impressive that the queue was flushed quickly :)
>>>
>>> Any sense of the likely timeline of this release? Enthought is fast
>>>> approaching release of Canopy 1.0 (next generation EPD). It will of
>>>> necessity be based on IPython > 0.13.1. Obviously it would be desirable all
>>>> around if that were a named version, i.e. 0.13.2.
>>>
>>>
>>> No specific timeline, but I don't think there are any more fixes that
>>> need to go in. I will probably do a bit of testing and cut an RC once the
>>> dust settles after PyCon/PyData next week, then, assuming I didn't break
>>> everything, we should have a release a week or two after that, so ~ 4/1 I
>>> guess?
>>>
>>> -MinRK
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>> Jonathan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 9:34 PM, MinRK <benjaminrk at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I've started the process of backporting PRs for an 0.13.2 bugfix
>>>> release,
>>>> the results of which can be seen by looking at Issues labeled
>>>> backport-0.13.2<https://github.com/ipython/ipython/issues?labels=backport-0.13.2&state=closed>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>> The following PRs have been backported so far:
>>>>
>>>> 2399
>>>> 2503
>>>> 2500
>>>> 2498
>>>> 2490
>>>> 2491
>>>> 2511
>>>> 2294
>>>> 2554
>>>> 2561
>>>> 2546
>>>> 2526
>>>> 2591
>>>> 2582
>>>> 2574
>>>> 2638
>>>> 2656
>>>> 2663
>>>> 2668
>>>> 2662
>>>> 2686
>>>> 2685
>>>> 2713
>>>> 2717
>>>> 2544
>>>> 2749
>>>> 2738
>>>> 2769
>>>> 2773
>>>> 2778
>>>> 2757
>>>> 2783
>>>> 2796
>>>> 2799
>>>> 2816
>>>> 2830
>>>> 2849
>>>> 2859
>>>> 2861
>>>> 2863
>>>> 2852
>>>> 2864
>>>> 2926
>>>> 2924
>>>> 2901
>>>>
>>>> If there are any others you think should be applied for 0.13.2, or if
>>>> any of those shouldn't be included, let me know.
>>>> In general, these are bugfixes that are either small or important. No
>>>> new features or APIs, etc.
>>>>
>>>> This is currently reflected in the 0.13.x branch<https://github.com/ipython/ipython/tree/0.13.x>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>> -MinRK
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> IPython-dev mailing list
>>>> IPython-dev at scipy.org
>>>> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/ipython-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 9:34 PM, MinRK <benjaminrk at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I've started the process of backporting PRs for an 0.13.2 bugfix
>>>> release,
>>>> the results of which can be seen by looking at Issues labeled
>>>> backport-0.13.2<https://github.com/ipython/ipython/issues?labels=backport-0.13.2&state=closed>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>> The following PRs have been backported so far:
>>>>
>>>> 2399
>>>> 2503
>>>> 2500
>>>> 2498
>>>> 2490
>>>> 2491
>>>> 2511
>>>> 2294
>>>> 2554
>>>> 2561
>>>> 2546
>>>> 2526
>>>> 2591
>>>> 2582
>>>> 2574
>>>> 2638
>>>> 2656
>>>> 2663
>>>> 2668
>>>> 2662
>>>> 2686
>>>> 2685
>>>> 2713
>>>> 2717
>>>> 2544
>>>> 2749
>>>> 2738
>>>> 2769
>>>> 2773
>>>> 2778
>>>> 2757
>>>> 2783
>>>> 2796
>>>> 2799
>>>> 2816
>>>> 2830
>>>> 2849
>>>> 2859
>>>> 2861
>>>> 2863
>>>> 2852
>>>> 2864
>>>> 2926
>>>> 2924
>>>> 2901
>>>>
>>>> If there are any others you think should be applied for 0.13.2, or if
>>>> any of those shouldn't be included, let me know.
>>>> In general, these are bugfixes that are either small or important. No
>>>> new features or APIs, etc.
>>>>
>>>> This is currently reflected in the 0.13.x branch<https://github.com/ipython/ipython/tree/0.13.x>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>> -MinRK
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> IPython-dev mailing list
>>>> IPython-dev at scipy.org
>>>> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/ipython-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> IPython-dev mailing list
>>> IPython-dev at scipy.org
>>> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/ipython-dev
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> IPython-dev mailing list
>>> IPython-dev at scipy.org
>>> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/ipython-dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> IPython-dev mailing list
>> IPython-dev at scipy.org
>> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/ipython-dev
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> IPython-dev mailing list
> IPython-dev at scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/ipython-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/ipython-dev/attachments/20130315/cb6f098f/attachment.html>
More information about the IPython-dev
mailing list