From bussonniermatthias at gmail.com  Tue Apr 11 12:18:55 2017
From: bussonniermatthias at gmail.com (Matthias Bussonnier)
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 09:18:55 -0700
Subject: [IPython-dev] Released ipython 6.0.0rc1
Message-ID: <CANJQusWrTRXnHQod1LP8irrv2dN2jLac6Nwj0P4EJg5VjQZv9Q@mail.gmail.com>

Hi all, I just made a release of IPython 6.0.0 Rc1 yesterday.
You can try with

    pip install ipython --upgrade --pre

This version is Python 3 Only, but if you have a recent enough pip,
you should automatically get the latest compatible with your system,
that is to say 5.x which is still actively developed.

See http://ipython.readthedocs.io/en/latest/whatsnew/version6.html for
the what's new.
-- 
Matthias

From damianavila at gmail.com  Wed Apr 12 09:56:03 2017
From: damianavila at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Dami=C3=A1n_Avila?=)
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 10:56:03 -0300
Subject: [IPython-dev] pdf slides from a Jupyter/IPython notebook using
 RISE
In-Reply-To: <CAHAreOqHBkgaEq24=wNAMs5BRf71+9ZGDLeuB864ohM-XXqMHA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <B19983D6-DCD7-4A01-B3D9-C73DEE756389@diee.unica.it>
 <CAOvn4qgWx11O7-gzgpxYeQhkEmjjzQVTPEVujwcc-JYaXzhTSQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHAreOqHBkgaEq24=wNAMs5BRf71+9ZGDLeuB864ohM-XXqMHA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAH+mRR01MeRqTjzxdq7qXS8oW2OLyLsN9CZmnZGZA3eoNaaGzA@mail.gmail.com>

Specifically for RISE, there have been some comments lately on this issue:
https://github.com/damianavila/RISE/issues/127#issuecomment-289034824

I did not tested but it seems to be working.

BTW, I hope to make to updates/enhancements soon to use the latest
reveal.js that seems to be better at the pdf generation (several PRs on
that topic merge lately). That should impact (and make better) the
slides coming
from nbconvert and also RISE.

Cheers.

2017-03-20 14:24 GMT-03:00 Fernando Perez <fperez.net at gmail.com>:

>
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 8:07 AM, Thomas Kluyver <takowl at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> You can try going into slideshow mode and then using the browser's print
>> function. I think this has been a problem in the past, though, and I don't
>> know if it's any better now.
>
>
> Supposedly adding `?print-pdf` to the URL makes this possible, but I know
> I and others have struggled with making it work reliably; e.g.
> https://github.com/hakimel/reveal.js/issues/1252.  Some more (old)
> background is here: https://github.com/ipython/ipython/issues/3993.  I
> haven't tested recently, so I have no idea if it's any better. Would love
> to hear if anyone has a reliable solution for this, coincidentally a
> colleague was asking me about this very problem just a few days ago.
>
> Cheers
>
> f
> --
> Fernando Perez (@fperez_org; http://fperez.org)
> fperez.net-at-gmail: mailing lists only (I ignore this when swamped!)
> fernando.perez-at-berkeley: contact me here for any direct mail
>
> _______________________________________________
> IPython-dev mailing list
> IPython-dev at scipy.org
> https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/ipython-dev
>
>


-- 
*Dami?n Avila*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/ipython-dev/attachments/20170412/9fcaa517/attachment.html>

From bussonniermatthias at gmail.com  Wed Apr 19 18:41:11 2017
From: bussonniermatthias at gmail.com (Matthias Bussonnier)
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 15:41:11 -0700
Subject: [IPython-dev] IPython 6.0 released
Message-ID: <CANJQusVcEajtF+2-SPR3S10wK2vn8ZPkVRNSi69bd-_ecJfzGQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi all,

We released ipython 6.0 about an hours ago.
The conda builder are currently preheating, but in the bmeantime you
can use PIP to install.

This release is Python 3 only. See our blog post
(https://blog.jupyter.org/2017/04/19/release-of-ipython-6-0/) and the
release notes (http://ipython.readthedocs.io/en/stable/whatsnew/version6.html)

  $ pip install ipython --upgrade

If you are on Python : Make sure you have pip 9 or above:

  $ pip --version
  $  pip install pip --upgrade

Or pip **will upgrade** to an incompatible Python version .

Reminder the IPython 5.x is LTS, is still compatible Python 2, and
will still get upgrades.
We should get 5.4 through the door soon hopefully (help welcome).

Thanks everyone for your help

Cheers,
-- 
M

From jason at jasongrout.org  Wed Apr 19 19:45:58 2017
From: jason at jasongrout.org (Jason Grout)
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 23:45:58 +0000
Subject: [IPython-dev] IPython 6.0 released
In-Reply-To: <CANJQusVcEajtF+2-SPR3S10wK2vn8ZPkVRNSi69bd-_ecJfzGQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CANJQusVcEajtF+2-SPR3S10wK2vn8ZPkVRNSi69bd-_ecJfzGQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAPDWZHwgKh5mOuvYphzHeLtFaOzhEHjfTMYARBHkorBPBsa=UQ@mail.gmail.com>

Congratulations! And our first python 3-only package!

How long are we planning to support 5.x?

Thanks,

Jason


On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 6:42 PM Matthias Bussonnier <
bussonniermatthias at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> We released ipython 6.0 about an hours ago.
> The conda builder are currently preheating, but in the bmeantime you
> can use PIP to install.
>
> This release is Python 3 only. See our blog post
> (https://blog.jupyter.org/2017/04/19/release-of-ipython-6-0/) and the
> release notes (
> http://ipython.readthedocs.io/en/stable/whatsnew/version6.html)
>
>   $ pip install ipython --upgrade
>
> If you are on Python : Make sure you have pip 9 or above:
>
>   $ pip --version
>   $  pip install pip --upgrade
>
> Or pip **will upgrade** to an incompatible Python version .
>
> Reminder the IPython 5.x is LTS, is still compatible Python 2, and
> will still get upgrades.
> We should get 5.4 through the door soon hopefully (help welcome).
>
> Thanks everyone for your help
>
> Cheers,
> --
> M
> _______________________________________________
> IPython-dev mailing list
> IPython-dev at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/ipython-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/ipython-dev/attachments/20170419/1f0c5d9b/attachment.html>

From rgbkrk at gmail.com  Wed Apr 19 20:03:28 2017
From: rgbkrk at gmail.com (Kyle Kelley)
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 17:03:28 -0700
Subject: [IPython-dev] IPython 6.0 released
In-Reply-To: <CAPDWZHwgKh5mOuvYphzHeLtFaOzhEHjfTMYARBHkorBPBsa=UQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CANJQusVcEajtF+2-SPR3S10wK2vn8ZPkVRNSi69bd-_ecJfzGQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPDWZHwgKh5mOuvYphzHeLtFaOzhEHjfTMYARBHkorBPBsa=UQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CA+tbMaUnjthVALyd+hctz5qrd07nzOJ=fv7Y57XSjL1SZYofzg@mail.gmail.com>

Woohoo IPython 6!

Also Uh oh! I've duped myself into thinking that the
IPython.display.display with updates was going to come to a Python 2
release. I was going to start doing deeper integration points into PySpark
since the changes to ipykernel were out and useful (I've been using
ip.display_pub.publish({
'text/plain': 'Initial'}, transient={ "display_id": "here" })).

On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 4:45 PM, Jason Grout <jason at jasongrout.org> wrote:

> Congratulations! And our first python 3-only package!
>
> How long are we planning to support 5.x?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jason
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 6:42 PM Matthias Bussonnier <
> bussonniermatthias at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> We released ipython 6.0 about an hours ago.
>> The conda builder are currently preheating, but in the bmeantime you
>> can use PIP to install.
>>
>> This release is Python 3 only. See our blog post
>> (https://blog.jupyter.org/2017/04/19/release-of-ipython-6-0/) and the
>> release notes (http://ipython.readthedocs.io/en/stable/whatsnew/
>> version6.html)
>>
>>   $ pip install ipython --upgrade
>>
>> If you are on Python : Make sure you have pip 9 or above:
>>
>>   $ pip --version
>>   $  pip install pip --upgrade
>>
>> Or pip **will upgrade** to an incompatible Python version .
>>
>> Reminder the IPython 5.x is LTS, is still compatible Python 2, and
>> will still get upgrades.
>> We should get 5.4 through the door soon hopefully (help welcome).
>>
>> Thanks everyone for your help
>>
>> Cheers,
>> --
>> M
>> _______________________________________________
>> IPython-dev mailing list
>> IPython-dev at python.org
>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/ipython-dev
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> IPython-dev mailing list
> IPython-dev at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/ipython-dev
>
>


-- 
Kyle Kelley (@rgbkrk <https://twitter.com/rgbkrk>; lambdaops.com)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/ipython-dev/attachments/20170419/b9751fca/attachment.html>

From bussonniermatthias at gmail.com  Wed Apr 19 20:07:04 2017
From: bussonniermatthias at gmail.com (Matthias Bussonnier)
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 17:07:04 -0700
Subject: [IPython-dev] IPython 6.0 released
In-Reply-To: <CAPDWZHwgKh5mOuvYphzHeLtFaOzhEHjfTMYARBHkorBPBsa=UQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CANJQusVcEajtF+2-SPR3S10wK2vn8ZPkVRNSi69bd-_ecJfzGQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPDWZHwgKh5mOuvYphzHeLtFaOzhEHjfTMYARBHkorBPBsa=UQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CANJQusW3Tz9Ap+_K8s4+KFhcFm7RrGcx5L5Ci37=mqcGZSmFMQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Jason

On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 4:45 PM, Jason Grout <jason at jasongrout.org> wrote:
> Congratulations! And our first python 3-only package!

JupyterHub was only Python 3 only :-)

> How long are we planning to support 5.x?

Our roadmaps says:

June 2016 : Release IPython 5.0 LTS

Traitlets "LTS"
ipykernel LTS
ipython_genutils LTS

January 2017 : Release IPython 6.0 Python 3 only.
July 2017 : Release Notebook 6.0 Python 3 only.
December 2017: IPython 7.0
December 2017: End of active support IPython 5.x LTS
July 2019 : Complete end of support for IPython 5.x

from [here](https://github.com/jupyter/roadmap/blob/master/accepted/migration-to-python-3-only.md).

I guess we are a bit late on Schedule, and technically we have 3 month
to drop Python 2 from the notebook package , we can slide a bit,
and we haven't decided IIRC if "No more support" means officially no
support, or actually incompatible in the codebase. Also it's not
because
the **server** is Python 2 incompat that you can't run Python 2 kernels.

-- 
M





>
> Thanks,
>

From fperez.net at gmail.com  Fri Apr 21 17:49:32 2017
From: fperez.net at gmail.com (Fernando Perez)
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 14:49:32 -0700
Subject: [IPython-dev] IPython 6.0 released
In-Reply-To: <CANJQusVcEajtF+2-SPR3S10wK2vn8ZPkVRNSi69bd-_ecJfzGQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CANJQusVcEajtF+2-SPR3S10wK2vn8ZPkVRNSi69bd-_ecJfzGQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAHAreOrq3qhctOgXDMMtD6kDqQyRgo8-SC5rws5uKHSniG3fZw@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 3:41 PM, Matthias Bussonnier <
bussonniermatthias at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> We released ipython 6.0 about an hours ago.
> The conda builder are currently preheating, but in the bmeantime you
> can use PIP to install.
>
> This release is Python 3 only. See our blog post
> (https://blog.jupyter.org/2017/04/19/release-of-ipython-6-0/) and the
> release notes (http://ipython.readthedocs.io/en/stable/whatsnew/
> version6.html)
>

Congratulations and a huge thanks to Matthias and everyone who continues to
push on keeping IPyhton fresh and valuable for the community.  I also want
to highlight the value of that well-written, thoughtful blog post: it
communicates very well the why and the how of our approach to the 2/3
transition, and I've already seen it being of value to other projects who
are considering similar questions.

Very best,

f
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/ipython-dev/attachments/20170421/3e22c234/attachment.html>

From bussonniermatthias at gmail.com  Fri Apr 21 18:05:51 2017
From: bussonniermatthias at gmail.com (Matthias Bussonnier)
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 15:05:51 -0700
Subject: [IPython-dev] IPython 6.0 released
In-Reply-To: <CAHAreOrq3qhctOgXDMMtD6kDqQyRgo8-SC5rws5uKHSniG3fZw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CANJQusVcEajtF+2-SPR3S10wK2vn8ZPkVRNSi69bd-_ecJfzGQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHAreOrq3qhctOgXDMMtD6kDqQyRgo8-SC5rws5uKHSniG3fZw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CANJQusWs3NdrMWiZa3JwOR6DXc7U954xZrU_ar9pqw8L2Dm3kw@mail.gmail.com>

> Congratulations and a huge thanks to Matthias and everyone who continues to
> push on keeping IPyhton fresh and valuable for the community.  I also want
> to highlight the value of that well-written, thoughtful blog post: it
> communicates very well the why and the how of our approach to the 2/3
> transition, and I've already seen it being of value to other projects who
> are considering similar questions.

Thanks, I got a lot of help From Thomas and Mike that proofread several time
and refactored some sections. So far we did not had any complaint that we were
breaking things for Python 2 users (which so far is a good sign). And the usual
Reddit and HN harsh comments were few.

We got already a  few bug reports where Jedi completion are less feature full
than what people expect. And now "complaints" that `?`/`pinfo` does not do
as much inference than <tab> :-D

I'm going to preach a bit how to do a smooth transition at PyCon in
about a month and detail a bit what we did upstream to allow this. I also
hope to get some time to backport a couple of PR that have merge
conflicts to the 5.x branch (if anyone want to help, look for close PRs with
the "Still Need Manual Backport" tag), and hopefully get a 5.4 release soon.
This will allow Python 2 / 5.x  users to re-use readline.

Cheers,
-- 
M

>
> Very best,
>
> f
>
> _______________________________________________
> IPython-dev mailing list
> IPython-dev at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/ipython-dev
>

From damianavila at gmail.com  Sun Apr 23 08:37:46 2017
From: damianavila at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Dami=C3=A1n_Avila?=)
Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2017 09:37:46 -0300
Subject: [IPython-dev] IPython 6.0 released
In-Reply-To: <CANJQusWs3NdrMWiZa3JwOR6DXc7U954xZrU_ar9pqw8L2Dm3kw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CANJQusVcEajtF+2-SPR3S10wK2vn8ZPkVRNSi69bd-_ecJfzGQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHAreOrq3qhctOgXDMMtD6kDqQyRgo8-SC5rws5uKHSniG3fZw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CANJQusWs3NdrMWiZa3JwOR6DXc7U954xZrU_ar9pqw8L2Dm3kw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAH+mRR0NoagJmd1hktjqX5rcy_AZpOj2C-JXtoO_eyS3_d0Ftw@mail.gmail.com>

A huge thanks to Matthias, Thomas and all the others contributing to this
beautiful piece of the ecosystem.

Cheers.

2017-04-21 19:05 GMT-03:00 Matthias Bussonnier <bussonniermatthias at gmail.com
>:

> > Congratulations and a huge thanks to Matthias and everyone who continues
> to
> > push on keeping IPyhton fresh and valuable for the community.  I also
> want
> > to highlight the value of that well-written, thoughtful blog post: it
> > communicates very well the why and the how of our approach to the 2/3
> > transition, and I've already seen it being of value to other projects who
> > are considering similar questions.
>
> Thanks, I got a lot of help From Thomas and Mike that proofread several
> time
> and refactored some sections. So far we did not had any complaint that we
> were
> breaking things for Python 2 users (which so far is a good sign). And the
> usual
> Reddit and HN harsh comments were few.
>
> We got already a  few bug reports where Jedi completion are less feature
> full
> than what people expect. And now "complaints" that `?`/`pinfo` does not do
> as much inference than <tab> :-D
>
> I'm going to preach a bit how to do a smooth transition at PyCon in
> about a month and detail a bit what we did upstream to allow this. I also
> hope to get some time to backport a couple of PR that have merge
> conflicts to the 5.x branch (if anyone want to help, look for close PRs
> with
> the "Still Need Manual Backport" tag), and hopefully get a 5.4 release
> soon.
> This will allow Python 2 / 5.x  users to re-use readline.
>
> Cheers,
> --
> M
>
> >
> > Very best,
> >
> > f
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > IPython-dev mailing list
> > IPython-dev at python.org
> > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/ipython-dev
> >
> _______________________________________________
> IPython-dev mailing list
> IPython-dev at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/ipython-dev
>



-- 
*Dami?n Avila*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/ipython-dev/attachments/20170423/0783c0ef/attachment.html>