[IronPython] Re: users-ironpython.com Digest, Vol 2, Issue 21
Randall Burns
randall_burns at yahoo.com
Wed Sep 29 16:27:53 CEST 2004
--- users-ironpython.com-request at lists.ironpython.com
wrote:
>MSH isn't really intended to be a script based
>application development environment for developing
>object oriented applications - it really is
>an administrative scripting tool that provides the
>glue that connects discoverable, user-defined
(binary) >commands - that communicate with
>each other through a structured object based
pipeline. >See
http://weblogs.asp.net/ahoffman/archive/2003/12/28/46162.aspx
Well at the very least, allowing Iron Python
Applications to be compatible with that pipeline would
seem like a good idea.
>IronPython addresses a different market
>..... in order to create
>somewhat more traditional executables and libraries.
Well, Perl has had libraries that give Perl the
equivalent functionality of the Unix Shell.
I've never regretted it when I chose perl or python
over the shell when writing a script over a few
lines. The main thing that is a key though: once you
learn a shell, sometimes you know how to do something
in it _very_ tersely-so having equivalent commands in
libraries in a "real" language can be quite handy-if
only as a memory device.
>I'm blown away by MSH's object pipeline, composable
>architecture and
>simple mechanism for command discovery - but dismayed
>by its $#*! syntax.
It seems like the first is something Iron python can
borrow-possibly parts of the second and the third
something iron python can fix.
This may be a way to do an end run around msh.
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
More information about the Ironpython-users
mailing list